Actually, USA is by far the most-watched cable network, followed by MTV and then a virtual tie between ESPN and Fox News.
Actually...you're wrong.Actually, USA is by far the most-watched cable network, followed by MTV and then a virtual tie between ESPN and Fox News.
You know, Anyone can play the numbers game.........
As you prove by using total viewership numbers from the full year 2011, but individual demographic numbers from Q1 2012.You know, Anyone can play the numbers game.
That's what you see. But, what is being shown is that some satellite guys are OK with it, and some aren't.Well I guess from the poll we can see one thing, satellite guys are ok with AMC being dropped
GaryPen said:That's what you see. But, what is being shown is that some satellite guys are OK with it, and some aren't.
Read my post again. Total viewership AND demographic are listed.As you prove by using total viewership numbers from the full year 2011, but individual demographic numbers from Q1 2012.
If you upgraded to Hopper, it only adds 1 year at $10/month. So the ETF isn't so bad. I just got a Hopper a couple of months ago, making my ETF around $70 in the June/July time frame. If you're a brand new sub, then the ETF is quite hefty: 2 years at $17.50/month. I'll miss my Hopper, but I'll drop Dish like a hot potato when they drop AMC and IFC.I'm stuck in my two year contract due to the Hopper. But I would be very upset to lose AMC.
Ghpr13
Read MY post again. I pointed out that you listed total viewership for full year 2011, but demographic info for Q1 2012, not that you only listed one or the other.Read my post again. Total viewership AND demographic are listed.
Very true.Some will not care if a channel is droped others will. It depends on your own personal tastes and what your viewing habits are. I myself wouldnt care if lmn got droped but i would care if science got removed. It depends on the person. You cant please every one all the time.
1 year? i thought it has always been 2?If you upgraded to Hopper, it only adds 1 year at $10/month. So the ETF isn't so bad. I just got a Hopper a couple of months ago, making my ETF around $70 in the June/July time frame. If you're a brand new sub, then the ETF is quite hefty: 2 years at $17.50/month. I'll miss my Hopper, but I'll drop Dish like a hot potato when they drop AMC and IFC.
I suggest you double-check with Dish. My contract extension was 2 years for the Hopper upgrade, as many others have confirmed for theirs.If you upgraded to Hopper, it only adds 1 year at $10/month. So the ETF isn't so bad. I just got a Hopper a couple of months ago, making my ETF around $70 in the June/July time frame. If you're a brand new sub, then the ETF is quite hefty: 2 years at $17.50/month. I'll miss my Hopper, but I'll drop Dish like a hot potato when they drop AMC and IFC.
As do many satguys.1 year? i thought it has always been 2?
dish told me they have not offered a 1 year contract in over 3 years.I suggest you double-check with Dish. My contract extension was 2 years for the Hopper upgrade, as many others have confirmed for theirs.
As do many satguys.
Color me confused, but then I do not see a problem or grounds for accusation of unfair comparisons.Read MY post again. I pointed out that you listed total viewership for full year 2011, but demographic info for Q1 2012, not that you only listed one or the other.
It was Fuji apples to Gala apples. AMC was rated higher in total viewership for Q1 2012 than for the full year 2011.Color me confused, but then I do not see a problem or grounds for accusation of unfair comparisons.
I posted total viewers for all time periods for apples to apples comparisons. I also posted some additional info for another comparison. If you want me to dig up demo comparisons for 2011 I will, but I can tell you there weren't terribly different from Q1 2012.