Bill - I don't entirely disagree with where you're going here. I too would like to get SA to recognize that they represented themselves as a Christian organization (which I don't believe can exist, except in the case of a church), and to get them to act in that manner regardless of the consequences. I do believe this is about money though - as the information that SA provided is still out there and available for people to purchase. The only gain to an individual by succeeding in a court setting is the financial aspect - either through 'free' services or monetary reimbursement. I realize the 'satisfaction' that can come from winning a court case, but you've got to realize that you're not going to turn SA around and cause them to really act like Christians.. if they go to court, the best they will do is follow the court's direction (which doesn't change their attitude, thus doesn't give any real satisfaction that we've made a change in their hearts)
One word of caution - Lawyers are lawyers regardless of your relationship with them. They are driven by certain things. A lawyer can see an opportunity and be convinced that its worth persuing. However, that doesn't always mean diddly. I may not be a lawyer, but I've done a fair amount of legal research, representing myself on occasion, providing essential evidence against others in other situations, etc. That doesn't make me a pro, or even an apprentice in the legal arena.. however I have gotten pretty good at seeing some of the clear signs and/or determining factors that will affect a case. In this case, the specific wording of the contract and the original intent of the contract will be key issues that cannot be overcome. The biggest issue though, as I see it, will be the technical issues regarding the distribution network. Unless you/your attorney is willing to invest significant time to learn the technical details inside and out, and invest tens of thousands of dollars in time/money for expert witnesses, SA has the technical resources and the financial resources to dance their way through a discussion and leave both judge and jury "knowing" that they are correct (believe me, I've SEEN this firsthand).
One word of caution - Lawyers are lawyers regardless of your relationship with them. They are driven by certain things. A lawyer can see an opportunity and be convinced that its worth persuing. However, that doesn't always mean diddly. I may not be a lawyer, but I've done a fair amount of legal research, representing myself on occasion, providing essential evidence against others in other situations, etc. That doesn't make me a pro, or even an apprentice in the legal arena.. however I have gotten pretty good at seeing some of the clear signs and/or determining factors that will affect a case. In this case, the specific wording of the contract and the original intent of the contract will be key issues that cannot be overcome. The biggest issue though, as I see it, will be the technical issues regarding the distribution network. Unless you/your attorney is willing to invest significant time to learn the technical details inside and out, and invest tens of thousands of dollars in time/money for expert witnesses, SA has the technical resources and the financial resources to dance their way through a discussion and leave both judge and jury "knowing" that they are correct (believe me, I've SEEN this firsthand).