arguable
Well, you can make arguments for all the fringe user who are technically FTA:
- those watching NASA/Angel on a used Dish box,
- Analog C-band,
- digital on previously subscribed DCII receivers (including StarChoice),
- and many more.
But if you subscribe to Dish, then your NASA/Angel doesn't count.
Neither do your freebie DCII channels, if you subscribe .
I suspect that all of the above don't amount to a whole lot.
But to point a finger at a pretty large segment of real FTA users, look at the Christian market for Glorystar.
I'll bet the bulk of those users (95%, maybe?) just watch the free programming provided on their two birds.
See if you can get a count on how many that might be!
Then, maybe everybody who's ever bought a Traxis FTA receiver.
I think this applies to all models, but at least the 3500 seems to be unsupported by hackers.
Sales figures on most of the HiDef FTA receivers (excepting the QualiTV) can be ignored.
You've got to think 80..95%
* of those sales are driven by hackers.
Probably 95% of Viewsat FTA receivers
* can be ignored.
Once you get to the mainstream DVB FTA receivers, the waters get pretty muddy.
The market is driven by hack sales
*, so over 50% have to be discarded.
Possibly 70%
* might be out there with no intention of real FTA use.
If that number seems high, just consider how big overall FTA receiver sales were before the appearance of the first hacked unit.
Since then, the market has exploded, and FTAers are not to thank
*.
edit:
Colbec raises a good point concerning motors.
I'll bet the bulk of those who've bought motors are legit FTA-watchers, regardless whether they're hackers or not.
So, maybe overall motor sales for North America might be some indication! 85 ... 95% of buyers?
Oh, and I've got two motors, if anyone asks.
One live and one dead.
* Consider the hack-features built into and advertized by all the receivers, if you doubt this claim.
Well, that's my opinion. What's yours?