Of course it does ... but, there are other large cities that don't even begin to touch New York's marketing....
Sean Mota said:How much has every team spent since last title?
For the fifth year in a row, the Yankees general manager's words have turned out to be prophetic. The Bronx Bombers again finished the season with baseball's highest payroll -- and without a World Series title.
So have the Yankees spent more in five seasons than the Pirates have since their '79 We Are Family title? The answer is yes. Yankees owner George Steinbrenner has emptied $777 million out of his piggy bank in player salaries since 2000, while the Bucs have spent a relatively meager $529 million.
But where do the Yankees rank in terms of all 30 major-league franchises in payroll expenditures since their last World Series, or since the 1977 season? You'd expect them to be in the top five, right?
Wrong. Surprisingly, the Yanks come in at No. 13. The unsavory distinction of baseball's biggest money-waster goes to their rivals in Queens. The Mets have spent a shade more than $1 billion in payroll chasing another championship, which has eluded them for the past 19 years.
Entire Article
Code:Rk Team Last Title Years Total Payroll Since Title (*Since '77) 1. New York Mets 1986 19 $1.0 billion 2. Los Angeles Dodgers 1988 17 $997 million 3. Texas Rangers -- N/A *$938 million 4. Chicago Cubs 1908 97 *$907 million 5. San Francisco Giants 1954 51 *$884 million 6. St. Louis Cardinals 1982 23 $883 million 7. Baltimore Orioles 1983 22 $881 million 8. Seattle Mariners -- N/A *$842 million 9. Cleveland Indians 1948 57 *$786 million 10. Houston Astros -- N/A *$783 million 11. Atlanta Braves 1995 10 $781 million 12. Philadelphia Phillies 1980 25 $778 million 13. New York Yankees 2000 5 $777 million 14. Chicago White Sox 1917 88 *$748 million 15. Detroit Tigers 1984 21 $671 million
Sean Mota said:Sometimes it does not pay to have an all star team. Sometimes is better to have a balanced team.So true Sean: You only have to look at the 2004 Lakers with Shaq, Kobe, Payton and Malone to see the truth in that statement. The Lakers were a better team with Derek Fisher instead of Payton.
Actually, they were contenders beginning in 74 (2nd place). In 75, they were 3rd place. In 76, 77, and 78, 1st place. Bad year in 79, but back to 1st place in 80 and 81. (FYI, they were also in 2nd place in 1970) So, for much of the 70's they were doing fine.mdonnelly said:You must have slept through the 70's. Then George took over and sleezed his way into prominence again.
Sorry, I've slept since then. Must have been thinking about the late '60s.GaryPen said:Actually, they were contenders beginning in 74 (2nd place). In 75, they were 3rd place. In 76, 77, and 78, 1st place. Bad year in 79, but back to 1st place in 80 and 81. (FYI, they were also in 2nd place in 1970) So, for much of the 70's they were doing fine.
It was the 80's and early 90's that were unkind to the Yankees, despite their high payrolls.
The latter half of the 60's also sucked for them.
As others have pointed out, it's completely worthless. It is comparing apples to vanilla.Sean Mota said:How about that table? Does it tells you something that you did not want to believe?
Couldn't agree more. I'm a Red Sox fan. I enjoy watching when the Sox and Yankees are in the ALCS. Now if Georgie or John Henry could teach Jacobs how to build a team, the Bruins may have a chance to win the cup. I'm not a diehard baseball fan, but I obviously watch when the Sox are in. With both of them out, I probably won't watch much of the ALCS or World Series. If the Yankees were still in, I'd watch. I'd watch, hoping to see them lose in the WS. I would guess ratings are up when the Yankees are playing, with most of the country tuning in, hoping to see them lose.yanks2402 said:If more people understood how true that is, there would be so many less problems in sports. The reason people hate the Yankees is they are just jealous that their team (1)doesn't spend money on their team and (2) doesn't win because they don't spend money on the team. Perfect examples, Angels, White Sox and Astros all INCREASED spending on teams and look where they are. Don't hate the Yankees just because they have an owner that is willing to spend his money on the TEAM rather then just stuffing his pockets.
dont24 said:I'm not a diehard baseball fan, but I obviously watch when the Sox are in. With both of them out, I probably won't watch much of the ALCS or World Series.
Not this people, pal. Ya see. I'm a baseball fan, not a winning-at-all-cost fan. There are many people just like me. We hate/dislike the Yankees specifically because of their owner, and the way he has basically ruined Major League Baseball. Because of his win-at-all-costs spending, he has made it nearly impossible to put together a contender without spending ridiculous sums of money.yanks2402 said:The reason people hate the Yankees is they are just jealous that their team (1)doesn't spend money on their team and (2) doesn't win because they don't spend money on the team.
emdawgz1 said:How are the Yanks an "Evil Empire"? Because he spends money? Love or Hate George, you have to admit, he's commited to winning. He could just as easily limit the Salaries to 100 mil and put the additional money in his pocket! Think about that 75-100 mil per season that he's spending and not banking. How mny people would do that!?
I live in phila, where thats just what ownership does. They swindled a new stadium out of the sucke.. i mean taxpayers, and they still wont invest in winning. It's ok w/ me i hate the phils. And i'm a giants fan so dont say that im pro yanks. I just dont think bashing them is fair either.