I don't care for Mike Lupica (the irritating know-it-all on the end on Sports Reporters) generally, but he has a great saying relative to the Olympics.
If the Olympics are not the be-all and end-all of your sport, they have no business there. I agree. Basketball, baseball, rugby, golf, soccer, ice hockey, and tennis already have worldwide championships that are far more significant than the Olympics, so why play them as a part of the Olympics?
Oh, as here are some questions I have seen. If you are going to add rugby and golf, why wait to 2016, when the sports are in Brazil, where they are unknown to unpopular, rather than in 2012 in the UK, where both sports were invented and are very popular? Particulaly golf.
BTW, the 2016 summer Olympics are not even being held in the summer. It really does not matter, because Rio is in the tropics, but August is mid-winter there.
As to baseball, I really do not see a worldwide desire, among either the players or the fans, to determine a champion on a "nation vs. nation" level, nor do I think that such a thing can be determined in short tournament in a sport where, over a season, the best team will lose 1/3rd of its games and the worst team will win 1/3.
I really feel sorry for the women in softball, which got lumped in with baseball. They deserve to be in the Olympics.
If the Olympics are not the be-all and end-all of your sport, they have no business there. I agree. Basketball, baseball, rugby, golf, soccer, ice hockey, and tennis already have worldwide championships that are far more significant than the Olympics, so why play them as a part of the Olympics?
Oh, as here are some questions I have seen. If you are going to add rugby and golf, why wait to 2016, when the sports are in Brazil, where they are unknown to unpopular, rather than in 2012 in the UK, where both sports were invented and are very popular? Particulaly golf.
BTW, the 2016 summer Olympics are not even being held in the summer. It really does not matter, because Rio is in the tropics, but August is mid-winter there.
As to baseball, I really do not see a worldwide desire, among either the players or the fans, to determine a champion on a "nation vs. nation" level, nor do I think that such a thing can be determined in short tournament in a sport where, over a season, the best team will lose 1/3rd of its games and the worst team will win 1/3.
I really feel sorry for the women in softball, which got lumped in with baseball. They deserve to be in the Olympics.