Average upconvert? You've seen it then I assume? It should upconvert as good as most BD players. As stated it uses the SAME chipset to upconvert as the Panasonic BD-30. Also, 99% of the population out there has no idea that Hi res audio even exists. (especially most in the market for this particular player) They will just hook it up with a coaxial cable. For those who actually care about DTS HD MA and Dolby True HD, they probably have a capable audio reciever or will pick one up soon. Heck you can get an Onkyo 605 for $299 online. Besides, NONE of the $399 and below upcoming STANDALONE BD players will internally decode DTS HD MA. (Not the Samsung 1500, the Sony S350 or the Philips BSP7200...they all will bitstream it) As far as BD live goes, it is purely a marketing buzzword. In the real world many could care less. HD DVD owners were polled and 4-5% of them actually downloaded content off of the internet. Not sure why you are so hellbent on bashing these players that use Sony and Panasonic components. You better hope these inexpensive players get out in the wild or otherwise BD will have a hard time surviving. Inexpensive players + Walmart = mass adoption. That is the truth whether you like it or not. This player is not for everyone, but it will fulfill it's purpose in the marketplace. Not everyone, in fact most cannot afford $999 Denon or even a $699 Panny BD player. If you can, then congrats to you. The cheaper players are exceeding people's expectations and are here to stay.......................The major shareholders in the BDA (Sony, Panasonic/ Mastushita) have made sure of it. They knew without them, Blu- ray cannot achieve mass adoption status.No internal decoding of All of the HD audio codec's. Big problem for 99% of the population!! Butt other then that who cares right. If you call a player that can only play a good BD picture, average upconvert, and no HD audio a decent player I have to disagree strongly. We'll talk about it not being 2.0 or better yet (get this)BD-live ready next time.
Last edited: