The business rules state that a customer can only lease 3 receivers or 6 tuners. So the maximum you could lease from Dish is 3 dual tuner receivers. This does not stop you from purchasing extra receivers though.
Dish is a low cost provider. I, as someone with but one receiver, am glad they are not enabling customers to lease mass amounts of receivers, as I believe that would cause all bills to go up. While some of you may think they are unreasonable, I think Dish's receivers are more money than most of us realize.Perhaps this is where Dish and I got "off the rails".
Maybe that is unreasonable to some, it just seems to me that in 2010 when you barely even find a non HD set anymore that having 5 TVs you want in HD (we actually have 7 rooms with HD TVs) is quickly becoming common place with each passing day.
5 HD signals may sound like a lot, but in a 5000 square foot home, it really is not from my perspective.
Only for the Rich and Infamous. And they are all 60+ inches or more. If you can afford 7 large tvs, you can afford Dish's prices.it just seems to me that in 2010 when you barely even find a non HD set anymore that having 5 TVs you want in HD (we actually have 7 rooms with HD TVs) is quickly becoming common place with each passing day.
.
I can understand your point of view. And I don't have a real issue with the receiver fees for leased receivers, although 'lease' is not really what it is at all. But there is exactly zero legitimate business reasons that they should charge a receiver fee at all for owned equipment. Well other than the one they use - because they can!
First I would just like to state that I did not intend this thread to turn into a type of "class warfare" and if I did, I do apologize
That said, I was never looking for a handout.
First I would just like to state that I did not intend this thread to turn into a type of "class warfare" and if I did, I do apologize
That said, I was never looking for a handout.
Heck before I was forced to look into Directv, I never really considered that a $17 per month "service access charge" was excessive. I simply expected to make a call, get two more HD receivers and increase my monthly bill by $34 to cover them. I would have been happy.
It is not like I was demanding a 922 for free with free service. The units I wanted are $100 units ($119 at dishstore.com) so $34 per month increase equates to $408 per year additional, on top of my already bloated $112 monthly bill. Thats $906 dollars over a 24 month contractual period or roughly 450% of what they cost at retail.
And that is what I was EXPECTING to pay and would have been comfortable with...
What Dish has effectively done is force me to re-evaluate the value of my service, which compared to what is available was not good.
:sob:Am I crazy for wanting 5 of my 7 60"+ or projector rooms to display At LEAST 720p? Really?
The fees for those units are not $17 each. but $7 each. Only dual tuner DVRs, excluding the 612, are $17.
Scherrman;2242580 HD 250 $17? what is this fee?[/QUOTE said:Was kind of wondering about that myself, its straight from my bill and thats a quote, but I "think' it was the 722 HD DVR service lease charge. I currently have two receivers; one 722 and one 222 both with DUO capability at non HD resolution. Guessing those are the $17 and $14 charges.