Well, PART of my question is answered.
What I've been told is that the call did indeed come from inside Dish, from the Loyalty Department, so that's good news, I guess, since it means my account hasn't been hacked by some unscrupulous outsider.
However, what no one has yet answered for me -- and I have PMd back to Ray to ask again -- is about the CONTENT of the call I got. Specifically, I was cold-called and told that my 3 existing VIP722DVRs, which are currently all working fine (basically, aside from the occasional expected blip), were somehow incompatible with signal/frequencies put out by a new HD satellite Dish had launched and that they would have to be upgraded or I would stop being able to receive Dish programming imminently -- perhaps as soon as within a month.
I live in the San Francisco Bay Area ... as far as I can see from what everyone here knows, the only "new" satellite is an Eastern Arc satellite ... should that affect me here on the West Coast? And if so, how am I the only one on this board who has gotten a call like this or heard about this potential problem? VIP722DVRs are still offered on the Dish site, so the problem can't be with the equipment in general ... is there something about my specific machines that is incompatible with this satellite?
The bottom line for me continues to be that I don't actually want to have to upgrade to Hoppers if I don't have to do it, because what we have is working well for us, and I have reasons to think Hoppers wouldn't work as well for us, even though I know a lot of people absolutely love them. I'm not bashing Hopper. My life is really complicated right now (taking care of a parent with a progressive dementia in addition to my other full-time jobs) and I don't have the time or bandwidth to try to learn a complicated new TV system. My work schedule is such that we're up til 3 or 4 every night, and the hours between about 1 and 3 are about the only "down time" we get ... so I don't want to be fighting with my TV system wanting to shut itself down and reboot at 1 am or 1:30 if I happen to turn my back on it for a few seconds to grab more ice from the freezer ... and I still have concerns about the readability issues, because I know other people still have problems with this, and my eyes aren't 20 or even 30 anymore even though my TVs are HD.
SO ... before I found this forum 2 nights ago, I emailed Dish directly, explained the strange call I'd gotten, and asked for confirmation IN WRITING that I HAD to accept this unwanted equipment upgrade AND sign a new 2-year contract in order to continue to receive my Dish programming. Last night, they emailed me back to cheerfully confirm my "order" for Hoppers and Joeys and my installation appointment on Saturday and completely ignored the question I had asked.
I've replied to Ray's PM thanking him for looking into the situation and verifying what I could not ... that the call I received DID come from inside Dish ... and for telling me that it came from the "Loyalty Department" ... and for confirming that an appointment shows in the system for a Hopper installation here on Saturday.
I've asked him now to please check and confirm the rest of what I was told. It is interesting to learn that the call came from the Dish Loyalty Department, but this equipment switchover was not positioned to me as some kind of "loyalty reward" for being a long-time customer of Dish. It was positioned as MANDATORY in order for me to continue to get a signal or programming at all within a fairly imminent time frame (possibly a matter of weeks). I want to know if that is actually true, or if I am just being pressured into making a change -- possibly simply in order to lock me into new 2-year service contract (perhaps coincidentally, my existing contracts have just expired on 2 of our DVRs and the remaining one will expire next month).
If it is NOT TRUE that I have to accept this unwanted upgrade in order to keep receiving programming, I do NOT want to switch my equipment at this time ... and Dish should review the tactics its Loyalty Department is using to pressure customers into signing new contracts, if that's what this was about.
On the other hand, if Dish HAS made a change ON ITS END that has caused my just 2-year-old 722s to stop being able to receive programming, but it is still offering and supporting 722s that CAN receive this programming, shouldn't it simply offer to replace my 722s outright without trying to force me into an upgrade or a new contract?
Anyway, sorry. I am projecting, leaping ahead, and jumping to conclusions unfairly here. Too little sleep and too much other stress in my life. I will wait to hear from Ray, who may be able to explain what I was told in a way that makes more sense. But I stress that there was no misunderstanding on my part during that long phone call from "Eric" ... I specifically asked the question, "Let me be sure I understand. Are you telling me that if I do not agree to replace my existing DVRs, I will no longer be able to receive Dish programming when you have completed the switchover to your new satellite?" Answer: "Yes." Me: "And how long is it going to take for this switchover to occur? It sounds like the sort of complicated thing that will probably take months and months." Answer: "Oh, no. We have been working on this for a long time now. We are down to the final 30% or maybe 25% of customers who have to be called and have their systems tested for compatibility. It may be as soon as a month from now that we shut down the old satellite."
My existing VIP722 DVRs were activated in October 2011, December 2011, and February 2012, respectively. They are not ancient machines or technology.
And since I'm feeling really squirrelly about all of this right now, if in fact it is the case that an upgrade is mandatory for me for some reason, I would still like, from Dish, a WRITTEN communication -- email would be fine! -- telling me that I MUST upgrade my equipment -- from DVRs they still seem to be offering to new customers from their site -- AND SIGN A NEW 2-YEAR CONTRACT -- in order to keep receiving my existing monthly programming at all.