I am wondering if the question will come up of what we the consumers can do to fight this. Besides writing some strongly worded letters to the FCC I dont have anything in mind.
But Primetime Anytime is not VOD, a user chooses to DVR those shows, they are not automatically recorded on their own.
VOD would also have more then one episode available.
I am wondering if the question will come up of what we the consumers can do to fight this. Besides writing some strongly worded letters to the FCC I dont have anything in mind.
I'm not saying that they would go after consumers. But one of their theories is that consumers in using the Hopper and Sling adapter are violating their copyright, so hypothetically, they could seek damages for those actions. I'm not saying it's likely, but implying that time shifting and place shifting is a breach of copyright law is in itself a very significant attack on consumer rights (regardless of whether they go after consumers directly or Dish indirectly based on that).
JPhil said:I don't read it that way. Fox's complaint and claim for relief says that IF "Dish contends that the unlawful copying described herein is done by its subscribers", then Fox says, "B***S***." "Dish's regular involvement is an indispensable link in it's customer's infringing conduct." etc.
IOW, We don't blame dish customers, they only do this because they are enabled and encouraged by DISH.
I read it differently, it's more along the lines of: if the claim that Dish is violating copyright fails because there is a finding that it is user enabled, then the users are violating copyright and Dish should be held liable for enabling and encouraging these activities. In other words, consumers time and place shifting content is not covered by fair use and it is unlawful. (which really is contrary to precedent and ridiculous given the decades of first VCR then DVR, media PCs and sling use.)
They don't go after the customers directly because that would be a no win for them. Expensive litigation with awful press surrounding the entire thing. It would just anger people and make them look even more anti consumer than just going after Dish.
So what is it that they seek to stop concerning the sling?
Transmission over the internet, which is expressly forbidden in their retransmission agreement (Breach of Contract).
Ok so my question is is this.
They knew about the Sling last year when they (Fox) entered into a new contract with Dish.So why are they just now bringing up a lawsuit for that?Did they order Dish to cease usage of the Sling in the wording of said contract?If so I don't recall hearing about it.
I'm not trying to argue for anything.Just think it's a fair question to ask and your answer didn't really answer the question.
I'm sure Charlie has Directv. How else can he see the Rockies, the Avalanche and his Volunteers in HD?
But are they in HD all the time? I turned on Fox Sports Detroit last night and found the Tiger/Indians game in sd! WTF?He doesn't have to go anywhere to do it. The Av's are in HD and so are the Rockies...in fact the Rockies are playing the Reds right now in HD on channel 414 on Dish!
nope. And sometimes its JIP'dBut are they in HD all the time?
exactly. But you well know a Dish kool aid drinker will say something like "maybe the game wasnt produced in HD"I turned on Fox Sports Detroit last night and found the Tiger/Indians game in sd! WTF?
Well, we are just going to be in disagreement on the intent of the second claim. I think it's pretty clear.
As for time shifting, Fox makes it clear throughout the complaint that this is not about normal DVR usage (i.e. time shifting). Specifically they seek an injunction and damages only for Prime Time Anytime and Sling.
Everyone gets this, right? They aren't just trying to shut down autohop but all of Prime Time Anytime.
But are they in HD all the time? I turned on Fox Sports Detroit last night and found the Tiger/Indians game in sd! WTF?