It's a bad situation for all sides involved. Fisher's losing, Dish is losing and the viewers are losing. However, given the current economic climate, I'd rather be getting a $1 back on my bill than an 82% increase on it...
At which point, many of us would simply change our provider...or stop carriage.
Probably would not have to go as high as congress.. the FCC already "gives" the networks the airways for free, they do have to pay some fees but not a direct user rate. It would seem that them selling something that is already given to them should not truly be allowed.I wish Congress would regulate this and set a national per subscriber rate for retransmission.
yes in post #310 of this thread
Despite its good faith efforts, Fisher to date has been unable to negotiate a new retransmission agreement with DISH Network ("DISH"). As a result, DISH subscribers in Fisher's seven television markets have been unable to watch the Company's television stations since December 17, 2008, the expiration date of the previous satellite carriage agreement between DISH and Fisher. As previously reported, DISH's CEO, Charlie Ergen, has repeatedly vetoed agreements in principal negotiated and agreed upon by Fisher and DISH representatives. The Company believes DISH is unwilling to negotiate a final contract unless Fisher drops its pending lawsuit against DISH. Fisher filed a breach of contract suit against DISH in federal court in Oregon claiming that DISH owes the Company approximately $1 million in retransmission fees under the prior carriage agreement for a station that DISH was contractually obligated to carry and pay for after it was acquired by Fisher in 2006.
YES!Is anyone else thinking about moving on to the other satellite guys?