N nathan_h Active SatelliteGuys Member Dec 25, 2007 23 0 Jun 17, 2009 #21 Or a 612, right? I just realized this might be compatible with the external hard drive from my 622. If that's the case, that is probably what I need to do.
Or a 612, right? I just realized this might be compatible with the external hard drive from my 622. If that's the case, that is probably what I need to do.
KAB SatelliteGuys Master Pub Member / Supporter Lifetime Supporter Sep 20, 2005 22,042 5,818 Fishers, IN Jun 17, 2009 #22 nathan_h said: Or a 612, right? I just realized this might be compatible with the external hard drive from my 622. If that's the case, that is probably what I need to do. Click to expand... Most everyone will tell you to get a 622/722 over a 612. Just not of the same quality.
nathan_h said: Or a 612, right? I just realized this might be compatible with the external hard drive from my 622. If that's the case, that is probably what I need to do. Click to expand... Most everyone will tell you to get a 622/722 over a 612. Just not of the same quality.
N nathan_h Active SatelliteGuys Member Dec 25, 2007 23 0 Jun 17, 2009 #23 Okay, and since I only have one 622 right now, I don't hit that magic ceiling, I guess. But I'm assuming but the start up cost and perhaps the ongoing cost, is higher with the 622/722? "Quality"= reliability issues, or output quality (picture)?
Okay, and since I only have one 622 right now, I don't hit that magic ceiling, I guess. But I'm assuming but the start up cost and perhaps the ongoing cost, is higher with the 622/722? "Quality"= reliability issues, or output quality (picture)?