The pros and cons of 3D. When a 3D (or any channel) channel is slated to close, it is only natural to discuss why it's closing. In a pro-format forum, the cons could/would be considered trolling.What is there to debate ?
The pros and cons of 3D. When a 3D (or any channel) channel is slated to close, it is only natural to discuss why it's closing. In a pro-format forum, the cons could/would be considered trolling.What is there to debate ?
That's like beating a dead horse....When a 3D (or any channel) channel is slated to close, it is only natural to discuss why it's closing.
I bought my TV because it was a 3D TV and we watch 3D whenever we can and we love it. I see the typical 3D haters are coming out. Great statements like "actually I've never watched anything in 3D, have no reason to ha ha. Brilliant. or this jewel, "the only 3D TV's we have sold is because they were such a great price". Yep, I'm sure that not one single customer bought because the TV was 3D, even though millions of owners buy 3D movies every year to watch on their 3D TV's. What a coincidence that over 140 3D movies have been produced in the last36 months. You know, like minor releases like Iron Man 3, Brave, The Lone Ranger, Man of Steel, Avatar, Life of Pi. The only 3D groupies out there are the haters.
The 3D forum is a place for those who like 3D to discuss it, not a place who hate 3D to go in and say how much they hate 3D.
Didn't stop the ridicule of Charlie and Dish though... Who thinks that any from that crowd will acknowledge that Charlie/Dish was right ?Well this sound's like Charlie may have been right about there just wasn't enough reason to have 3D. That Dish would wait and see sounds like smart thinking on his part. I really feel that 3D is more something that needs to be experienced in the large screen that immerses one in the picture.
3D TV has a number of problems that are holding back its acceptance. That's too bad IMHO, because the less it's accepted by the general public the less likely it is to be widely available at a reasonable price, and the less likely companies will invest in improving the technology. Some of the problems I can think of (in no particular order) are
- There are some people (about 10 or 15 per cent of the population) who simply cannot see in true 3D. They get their depth information from other visual cues that don't do them much good for 3D movies
- The need for glasses is a real turn off and most 3D glasses are poorly made and very uncomfortable to wear
- 3D movies require a bright picture to be watched without strain. Many TV's just aren't bright enough.
- The bandwidth requirement for good 3D is large. Off-air and especially satellite just can't supply the bandwidth, so things like ESPN 3D start off with a real disadvantage for a good viewing experience.
- The best 3D in-home experience available today comes from 3D Blu-Rays. But that requires not only a 3D TV but a 3D Blu-Ray player which of course costs more money.
So, much as I like to watch 3D TV, I am not hopeful that it will survive.
Liking 3D is a matter of choice. You like it or you don't. If you like it, it does not make you wrong for liking it.
I like Coke and hate Pepsi.
The 3D forum is a place for those who like 3D to discuss it, not a place who hate 3D to go in and say how much they hate 3D.
If I would have saw this topic the other day I probably have closed it since its not really a DISH topic since DISH never carried ESPN 3D.
Also I said it before ESPN had a lot to do with the demise of ESPN 3D as most providers charge $9 to $12 a month for the one channel. Even if you are a 3D fan that was too much to pay for a channel which was showing basketball games from 2 years ago in 3D.
The Krell, you have such a nice pool.
You mind of I come over and pee in it?
Same thing.
Each forum here is to help people learn more and get the most from their equipment. It is not a place to come and just crap on things because you don't like them.
If you want to dump on 3D feel free to do it in the Chit Chat Forum.