tnguy said:does the video.quality suffer when you transfer the video to the panny?...
I was using a Radeon.TyroneShoes said:Not much. It is barely noticeable, even if you are looking for it. It is a lot less noticeable than the difference between the PQ of a bit-bucket PVR such as your 510 (terrific) and the PQ of a standalone PVR such as Tivo or Replay (not so terrific).
feed came via downrezzed hd super video from a 6000TyroneShoes said:Not scientific enough to support Replay as better or worse (too many variables). We don't know where the artifacts really came from or whether the variance in the source material was a factor. Variable source material can produce even more wildly variable quality on a DVDR or a PVR, both of which are in the mix, making this evidence, at least as stated, less than empirical.
A controlled experiment such as having the same live feed side-by side on a Replay and a 501 tells the true tale, especially when viewing both good and poor source material. Of course the receiver feeding the Replay must have equivalent PQ to the 501, such as a 301.
I've seen the controlled experiment, and the results leave no doubt.
GaryPen said:I wonder if the TV Guide interface on that Philips DVDR is what we'll be seeing on our Dish DVR's, once they get NBR up and running? After all, they're supposed to be using the same TVG/Gemstar technology. Maybe they'll use it for non-DVR EPG's, as well.
FYI, that 2nd Philips model upscales to HDMI AND Component Outputs. I'm VERY interested in it.
dfergie said:Used an ati card for awhile, for me the dvd was much better.