Over weekend I went to local pub and half the screens were on the dispute message.
You should post a picture of that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Over weekend I went to local pub and half the screens were on the dispute message.
Whatis ETF? Exchange Traded Fund?Many of the ESPN on-air talent were promoting DirecTV alternatives going into the weekend.
If it's not back tonight, it'll either trigger enough of a watershed movement in cancellations to get DirecTV to outright cave or be the biggest sign that this will be a very long term dispute IMO.
Both options are pretty self-fulfilling, unfortunately. Stick to their guns and accelerate already significant churn, or pay for it and barrel towards a unsustainable service - an outcome many traditional providers are headed towards anyways as they still continue to struggle to figure out how to pivot to streaming while preserving things like their fee structure.
I wonder if this dispute will factor into the FCC's considerations when it comes to ending ETFs.
Whatis ETF? Exchange Traded Fund?
Does anyone remember the DiSH dispute with the dueling crawl messages?
Yes, it was back in October of 2022 and it only lasted a couple of days, new contract had every channel unlike the deal they would do with Spectrum the following year.Does anyone remember the DiSH dispute with the dueling crawl messages?
the very least the OTA channels buy law that are pay to carry should not be allowed have legal BS part of the deal or be tied to other cable channels.Consider this a rumor, that I might of heard from work-
Finding out a little more, Disney is not asking for a increase in per sub fees, what they are asking for is a legal agreement, which consists of they(DirecTV) will not have a problem with the new ESPN streaming service, Venu has not been brought up.
Other providers already agreed to that in the last deal they signed.
Another rumor, cancellations since this started, are in the six figures already.
Yes that rumor has been out there since the beginning. I think the wording in the quote was worse than that though and basically said DTV couldn't participate in any lawsuits against Disney.Consider this a rumor, that I might of heard from work-
Finding out a little more, Disney is not asking for a increase in per sub fees, what they are asking for is a legal agreement, which consists of they(DirecTV) will not have a problem with the new ESPN streaming service, Venu has not been brought up.
Other providers already agreed to that in the last deal they signed.
Another rumor, cancellations since this started, are in the six figures already.
None.What impact will that have on negotiations?
Yep, it is a disaster for them, if this goes a long time, they will keep losing subscribers, which will push them ever closer to unprofitability.Ultimately no matter what DIRECTV chooses they will lose.
I still do not understand why this is a big deal, two other channels, that receive high per sub fees and better ratings then ESPN, CBS/NBC, offer their content on their streaming services, both On Demand and a Live Channel.DISNEY is looking to sell directly and cut out the middleman (DIRECTV and others). by having them sign away their rights just helps DISNEY more in this regard.
There is for all the other providers, streaming and Traditional.There is no win win.
As usual, Streaming sux.Wonderful, now that I am on the ESPN App (espn+ ?)
I am now getting "Buffering" at various times ...
Have Never got Buffering for any other Apps.
Does not look like itwill ABC try to block simulcasting of the debate?
That would be Very hard, seeing the Debates are typically on ALL Major Networks.Does not look like it
DirecTV to provide workaround to watch the presidential debate amid Disney dispute
An ongoing carriage dispute between Disney and DirecTV has resulted in millions of Americans left unable to view major primetime events, but the presidential debate will be aired.www.foxbusiness.com