Echostar continues to have weak technology
First, thanks to Bill R. for posting the info on Brian K. Murphy, Esq, the law firm Prestemon chose to represent him (us) against Echostar. If these guys are so lame that they can't include the "claim form" in their notice, what do you figure their chances are against the EchoStar lawyers? Since EchoStar isn't pouring money into improving their technology, they must be funnelling it to their legal dept.
I went out to the EchoStar website to sign up and see what pathetic pittance these legal eagles had qualified me for -i.e. if I have "PTV Services." Of course, the EchoStar website won't let you put dashes in your phone number, requires cookies, and then ulitmately doens't work. Is everything about this company completely lame?
I am wondering if it is better to withdraw from the lawsuit since I am unable to make any kind of claim anyway, and ditch EchoStar for Time Warner which is now offering a PVR similar to ES for free. Especially if I can sell my current ES receiver on ebay. Inertia keeps me with ES for now. But I wonder if we loyal, lazy subscribers will pay the price in degraded quality when ES has to pay out on the lawsuit. There is probably no free lunch here, is there?
I also sold my dust encrusted 7200 on ebay, but only got $240. Way to go Rick!!! I am not complaining. I assume that these guys know how to hack, ie descramble, the signal from EchoStar. Wish I were that smart.