By that argument, we should be swimming in 3D content. I say poppycock to your vision for several years at least.Now that a lot of 4K tv's are coming to market I can see where a lot of 4K channels would become available over the next few years.
By that argument, we should be swimming in 3D content. I say poppycock to your vision for several years at least.Now that a lot of 4K tv's are coming to market I can see where a lot of 4K channels would become available over the next few years.
CES is all about new equipment so that's not a breathtaking prediction. UHD is no longer so much about new hardware as much as it is about being in a holding pattern for mainstream UHD content. While we should see a wave of UHD delivery mechanisms coming out of CES, it is by no means a guarantee of a tsunami of UHD channels.who knows what will happen at CES scott said everytihing with the tv industy will be showing all the new boxes and what i will say give it some time for 4k to catch on scott said there are just of handful of 4k channels right now who knows what will happen in the future.
i have to agree on that pont right there i woluld say gett all the channels added in hd before woring about UHD.Um, aren't we still waiting for AHC to be added in HD?!?!?!?! I'm sure there are others but that's the one I want. Or are they going to skip and go straight to UHD? Seems they should finish with HD before getting started on UHD.
That is a topic for another thread (that already exists, BTW).Um, aren't we still waiting for AHC to be added in HD?!?!?!?! I'm sure there are others but that's the one I want. Or are they going to skip and go straight to UHD? Seems they should finish with HD before getting started on UHD.
CES is about hardware. It's extremely unlikely that content distribution deals would be announced then.who knows what will be coming to us until CES next month? all we have to do is to wait.
Then you must have had a Crappy 1080p tv.
You can't pull details out of thin air when they don't exist.
Upconverted content is taking a smaller picture it stretching it to fit a bigger one.
And then you see more details of a stretched picture beyond its native resolution is not better PQ.
In fact you see things you shouldn't see.
It's not rocket science.
If it was you wouldn't be able to buy it for $348 at Walmart.
Now some of you guys got me wondering If you even know what good HD is.
Sounds to me you think stretch o vision, grainy picture, over contrasting, over Sharpness and bright color is good HD.
And taking 540 or 720 depending on your tv, and stretching it to fit 1920 is the same as taking 1920 and stretching it to 3800.
It's taking something that's not there and spreading it over a larger area.
Acually in fact Dish's HD is 1440x1080 and now your stretching that to over 3800.
Yikes.
Only the 720p content is full res...
Yes them 4K tvs turned your SD Picture into a watchable HD wonder.You obviously don't have a 4k set and therefore don't know what you are talking about. My 1080 set is a premium set, moved upstairs. Upconverting algorithms work, even the SD picture is now watchable. Your loss!
It is not good form to answer your own questions.who knows what will be coming to us until CES next month? all we have to do is to wait.
By that argument, we should be swimming in 3D content. I say poppycock to your vision for several years at least.
Let's get to one or two before we start discussing the impact of dozens.If they launch a few dozen popular channels then that in my book would be a lot of channels if it has good content.
Is third-rate TV shows going to be enough or are they really just looking ahead to the UHD Blu-ray market?To be honest, with NBC already putting shows out on 4K, I am guessing they will be the ones to break the ice on a channel.