Scott is the main know-it-all about such things, so when he knows there will be a thread announcing that it has gone live. Otherwise, we have to go by his gut which says "soon". It'll be anytime between now and a few months. Until then, you can watch WWE or TNA to fill your wrestling needs.So is it real unlikely that ESPNU will be in HD by the NCAA wrestling tourney this Thurs?
I'm a newbie so take it easy on me.
Thank you.
I can't believe that I'm saying this, but there's no point to espn news in HD these days. When dish lost it, it had extra bars for specific stats. Now its like watching sports center 24/7. Too me the room could be used elsewhere.
I doubt they have any widescreen SD channels because the 16:9 format is usually used exclusively for HD channels.
Scott is the main know-it-all about such things, so when he knows there will be a thread announcing that it has gone live. Otherwise, we have to go by his gut which says "soon". It'll be anytime between now and a few months. Until then, you can watch WWE or TNA to fill your wrestling needs.
Not so. ATSC does in fact have SD 16x9 formats. Wiki it.
Sent from my iPhone using SatelliteGuys
ATSC does in fact have SD 16x9 formats.
I don't think we'll ever see an increase in PQ. Dish has found an "acceptable" (to them) level and will stick with it. If we're lucky, they won't decrease it.......and maybe even improve picture quality?
Is anyone broadcasting notably better?I don't think we'll ever see an increase in PQ. Dish has found an "acceptable" (to them) level and will stick with it. If we're lucky, they won't decrease it....
Is anyone broadcasting notably better?
Indeed it does, and furthermore this mode works on all legal ATSC tuners, even the cheapest decoder boxes for older TVs. So it DRIVES ME CRAZY when local channels (you hear me PBS?) letterbox a widescreen program, then transmit it as 4:3, thereby making it picture-framed on widescreen TVs. Why why why? :rant:
I guess you could say I have blinders on, but I have limited exposure to other providers. Time Warner is the only one I've seen closely. I know one person who has (or had) ATT Uverse but we didn't watch any TV there. Some people have DirecTV but I don't analyze it, compare different channels, make sure settings are correct, etc.... Hell, my in-laws had standard-def set-tops connected to HDTVs for years and when they did switch to HD boxes, they were connected with coaxial cable.Is anyone broadcasting notably better?
Is anyone broadcasting notably better?
Which is why I stated a "notable" difference.It's all subjective. Everyone has their own opinion.
I thought they optimized their signals for a certain display size that is most common, say 46 to 50inch?
Then why call Dish out on the "acceptable" line?I guess you could say I have blinders on, but I have limited exposure to other providers.
Anecdotally, I think Verizon is the only one I've heard that is considered typically the best. At Satguys, some say Directv is better than Dish, some have said there is really no difference, a few have noted The Hopper has a slightly better image.I have watched Verizon Fios TV before when visiting relatives in Florida and it looked pretty awesome to me. But I don't have a clue what they are broadcasting for as compressing the signal, etc.