There seems to be some excitement here at the summit about a possible merger. Most seem optimistic about it and like the idea of it.
Everything I hear is that Sprint's coverage is just too spotty. Yes, some/many areas, they have excellent coverage and if it's where you live, work, travel, that's fine. I hear all too often about Sprint or T-Mobile that if you go outside your normal "home" area and venture too far from major highways though, you're in trouble for coverage. For me, they don't even offer their WiMax/4G service, let alone LTE, on the data side.I would switch back to Sprint if it did go through, I had Sprint before and they worked great in my area.
Maybe not AS spotty, but AT&T has it's weak areas as well...like in Naples FL where my Mom lives. Nearly impossible to get above one bar signal in her immediate area. She switched to Verizon because of it.Everything I hear is that Sprint's coverage is just too spotty. Yes, some/many areas, they have excellent coverage and if it's where you live, work, travel, that's fine. I hear all too often about Sprint or T-Mobile that if you go outside your normal "home" area and venture too far from major highways though, you're in trouble for coverage. For me, they don't even offer their WiMax/4G service, let alone LTE, on the data side.
They did not do what many thought they were going to do, because they had no plans to do so. Blockbuster was already in the ground (bankrupt) when Dish acquired them. Instead of trying to resurrect the dead, they picked the carcass clean and discarded (sold off) the rest. The Sprint situation is a completely different scenario, there is no correlation to be made from one to the other.I am basing my assumptions on what DISH could of done with Blockbuster and did NOT do so. They didn't expand the application for all the public to use , they closed them all down. They didn't become a competitor to Netflix with streaming video ,like many in the industry thought that they would do, instead they closed it down except for DISH customers. Note their streaming video section is a disorganized mess. They didn't maintain the physical stores and have steadfastly closed all of them, one by one , as their leases come due. So when I see how they ran Blockbuster into the ground , Forgive me if I feel that they would do the same thing to Sprint if they ever got their hands on it. That is based on MY view of the Facts of how Blockbuster has operated since DISH took them over.
I do think this merger is best for Sprint and DISH. I do hope it goes through. I would switch back to Sprint if it did go through, I had Sprint before and they worked great in my area.
That is 100% correct and those intentions were made clear from the start.They did not do what many thought they were going to do, because they had no plans to do so. Blockbuster was already in the ground (bankrupt) when Dish acquired them. Instead of trying to resurrect the dead, they picked the carcass clean and discarded (sold off) the rest. The Sprint situation is a completely different scenario, there is no correlation to be made from one to the other.
Yeah, I know. Someone is trying to Weekend at Bernie's that dead horse and make it Sprint.The Blockbuster argument is a dead horse. Stop beating it.
Yeah, I know. Someone is trying to Weekend at Bernie's that dead horse and make it Sprint.
It seems Softbanks is merely a merger while the Dish/Sprint combination could have a potential to be a game changer for the industry. Terrestrial OTA is the future. It may not be now, but it is the future. Its odd that a new player could get into the cell game so late, yet have a massive advantage over the old players, ie untouched bandwidth.I do think this merger is best for Sprint and DISH. I do hope it goes through. I would switch back to Sprint if it did go through, I had Sprint before and they worked great in my area.
Ha! Now that's funny.
Stop it now or you guys will both become irrelevant too !!Yeah, I know. Someone is trying to Weekend at Bernie's that dead horse and make it Sprint.
Personally, I would never get ATT for that same reason. I rarely ever publicly "question" ATT's coverage area because I'd get an endless argument about how wrong I am. My co-worker has ATT and travels all over the country. If he's driving anywhere outside of a major city, I expect multiple drops during every conversation we have while he's out. Or, I can't count the number of times I call and it goes straight to an "operator" message or it never even rings.Maybe not AS spotty, but AT&T has it's weak areas as well...like in Naples FL where my Mom lives. Nearly impossible to get above one bar signal in her immediate area. She switched to Verizon because of it.