Yet every 5 minutes I see DISH commercials (when not watching DVR'd content) stating DISH has so many more cheap packages "under $60 a month" compared to DirecTV. Yeah, if you don't have a DVR or two. Seems to me that their pricing scheme is doing the exact opposite of what this article claims. Trying to appeal to those "lower-end" customers that don't need a DVR. I would think that the more "affluent" customers would want at least 1 or 2 DVRs, but even those with the money aren't willing to spend so much on receiver fees alone.
Now maybe your post did not mean to come out this way,but I have only one HDDVR(VIP722k/wMT2) for my HDTV and SDTV and I save money with Dish Network when I compare my setup to any other provider.
Plus last month the bad economy got us and with Dish Network I was able to go from AT250 to AT120 and keep my HD For Life which made my bill cheaper than if I was with any other provider.
I can't wait for the economy to get better so I can readd programming.