The article failed to mention churn...Lost...25,000
Added...752,000
New Customers Acquired: 752,000
Existing Customers Terminating Service (aka Churn): 777,000
Net Customer Add/Loss: -25,000
The article failed to mention churn...Lost...25,000
Added...752,000
They used the same reasoning last quarter. If it really is the economy then one would expect other providers to do bad and the provider with the cheaper package options (i.e. Dish to do better). But the prior quarter both FiOS and Direct did very good while Dish suffered more than expectedFrom Dish Network's 2Q Net Up 50%, EchoStar Swings To Profit
"The firm lost 25,000 net subscribers during the quarter, which it blamed on the weak economy, as well as impressive advertising of it competitors, especially in high-definition services..."
I thought they simply lost 25k individual subs, which would not be bad at all. Then it turns out they actually had a net loss of 25k subs. This is not good. Even I as a Direct sub hopes Dish does a lot better. Subs of both providers need both companies to stay competitive.
I am not math guy but I am trying to figure how they made a profit with a loss of 25,000 customers.
The article failed to mention churn...
New Customers Acquired: 752,000
Existing Customers Terminating Service (aka Churn): 777,000
Net Customer Add/Loss: -25,000
They lose money on new customers (equipment installation etc) fewer customers also equals fewer truck rolls etc.. they prolly got rid of more than a few tsr's and csr's etc..RiffJim was close with his prediction of a 30,000 subscriber loss.
I am not math guy but I am trying to figure how they made a profit with a loss of 25,000 customers. Something is not adding up to me there.
Thanks, but I also the same person who stated VOOM DBS would create a niche market of 1 million HD customers by 2008.RiffJim was close with his prediction of a 30,000 subscriber loss.
Simple...now that VOOM is gone from lineup, they are getting $10-$20 per whack per HD customer, and the HD channels in their lineup are either free or very low cost to them; they were probably paying between 8-10 milllion per month with VOOM in the lineup. Additionally, E* has been pushing the DVR. If you're like my family, you probably have more than one DVR in your home (I have 7 or 8). I wouldn't be surprised if there are more than million DVRs in service than last year, at $5.98 a whack.I am not math guy but I am trying to figure how they made a profit with a loss of 25,000 customers. Something is not adding up to me there.
From Dish Network's 2Q Net Up 50%, EchoStar Swings To Profit
"The firm lost 25,000 net subscribers during the quarter, which it blamed on the weak economy, as well as impressive advertising of it competitors, especially in high-definition services.
The deal with AT&T was supposed to help with the declining number of new customers for the company. But when AT&T registered only 3,000 net new customers in the second quarter - down from 162,000 a year ago - it told Dish it was cancelling the new agreement at the end of the year, opening the possibility it will sign with DirecTV. Total subscribership for Dish is now 13.79 million.
The number of customers who left the network, the company's churn rate, rose to 1.87% from 1.68%"
I wonder if the AT&T number that's published is another reason that AT&T told Dish they were terminating their marketing agreement at the end of the year?
Your total is per month...multiply by 3 and you'll wind up with a quarterly total of 780,000.Where does the 777,000 number come from?
13,900,000 X 0.0187 = 260,000 +/-
What am I missing here?
Brad