No need for Dish to reply with a comment like that (assuming it's true) about quality of programming and placement. It is why even those of us who agree future cost of AMC is a real issue, we agree it is driven by the lawsuit.
The new response adds a different wrinkle, one that Dish has fought before. Sounds like Dish does not want one of, or some of IFC, Sundance, WE. And AMC is requiring all or none. Very possible that was the proposal from Dish - we can talk about an increase for AMC, but want to drop other channels and not incurr that cost.
Oh it's definitely true. Here is another similarly unprofessional version of that response. This was posted 27 minutes ago as a response to a facebook comment.
"You can continue to watch your favorite programming on AMC (ch9609), WEtv (ch9608) and IFC (ch9607) for the time being. We have relocated these channels to be in a channel location that is more reflective of the quality of programming.
Regarding the Channel numbers where AMC, IFC and WEtv were previously located you will now find great programming from HDNet (ch130/392), indie plex (ch393), Style (128/391). ~Raymond G"