OLN Hockey said:...I posted FACTS ... PERIOD ...
Slamminc11 said:well at least how you have decided to see them, yes you did.
OLN Hockey said:The NHL stance is simple ... they do not want Companies doing what dish did ... put OLN on the most expensive tier and jack the SUBS who want to watch hockey ... the want the BEST market penetration possible for their sport
It is NOT a matter of being in 80 percent of the HOMES ... it is a matter of being on a TIER that AT LEAST 80 percent of the subs have ... In 99 percent of the cases the other 20 percent of the subs have TIERS HIGHER and include OLN ... meaning 100 percent penetration for the NHL on OLN
If you are a hockey fan and have the channel the game is on you are most likely going to tune in ... deosn't matter if it is OLN, ESPN, FX, MSG ... etc ....
In the case of dish ONLY 36 percent of the SUBS would have receive OLN ... however if it were on tha AT 60 (which is the only tier 80 percent of the subs have) OLN would have been available to 100 percent of the DISH subs ....
Bluebull32 said:It looks much more like an attempt for OLN to use its shiny new NHL contract to try and bully providers into putting it into a more mainstream package. AT60 is for channels that appeal to MOST households. Can you really say with a straight face that OLN appeals to MOST households? I hope not. This is just OLN trying to make some quick $$$, and rape NHL fans in the process. If they want so desparately to break into AT60, just put better shows on the network.
I hope I wasnt too vague this time...sorry about earlier
OLN Hockey said:The truth is that a portion of people who were AT180 subs were AT180 solely for OLN ...
Bluebull32 said:How could you POSSIBLY know this? How could anyone really? While youre at it, can you tell me the percentage of people that have signed up for 120 just for Fox News? Youre the guy with the numbers here. Was there a scientific poll conducted? If so, please provode the link. If not, we can all safely assume that your "portion" consists of about 2 or 3 people that you know personally. So quit making stuff up!
OLN is garbage without NHL, and is not AT60 with it!
BTW, you didnt answer my Question. Do you think OLN appeals to MOST households?
OLN Hockey said:I work with the NHL so I could care less about how appealing OLN is to most housholds ...
The fact of the matter is that OLN DOES HAVE the NHL ... so this "without the NHL" biz is garbage ...
My FACTS about people having AT180 just for OLN is based on more than a few people I know ... Like I said if I weren't bound by certain things called LEGAL AGREEMENTS I would give you a specific # ...
Dish won't tell you how many Subs they have lost as a result of not having OLN ... but there are other companies who will tell you how many SUBS they GAINED because they wanted OLN and couldn't get it with DISH ... SOME companies were even PAYING the early term fees as credits to people who left dish on top of the credit they gave them for giving up the dish
Let me skin this cat in a way I am legally allowed to ... If people LEFT DISH because they couldn't get OLN ... don't you think they were subscribed to AT180 so they could GET OLN .... Are you getting it yet or am I to far out of the box for you to comprehend ... are you doing the math yet here ....
Like I said get off your rear end and do some RESEARCH for yourself ... the info is all out there ....
OLN Hockey said:Or ... As I KNOW them ... FIRST HAND
I have a challenge to you ... PROVE me WRONG ... come back with FIRST hand FACT to dispell anything I have written!!!!
The FACT is you won't be able to ... I have FIRST hand knowledge of my FACTS and if I wasn't bound by legal agreements I would post them ... until that time comes I can give you the FACTS ... keep calling customer service and ask for a manager ... eventually they will tell you the TRUTH about why OLN is gone ...
So to ANYONE who wants to CRY bunk about my FACTS ... POST something to PROVE any of this WRONG ... if I am wrong or biased or whatever you want to cry ... PROVE me WRONG ... show me the money
Until you can PROVE anything I have written as FALSE ... keep speculating ... or just accept the FACTS
Bluebull32 said:Thanks for (once again) not answering a single one of my questions. You've obviously come onto this forum with an agenda, and had it thrown back in your face by every other member here.
While we are at it, I happen to know that Nearly ALL subscribers think that OLN amounts to dog excrement, BUT..... if I weren't bound by certain things called LEGAL AGREEMENTS I would give you a specific #....sorry, wish I could help.
Come back when you can back something up! Until then, quit misinforming us. It's bad enough that OLN screwed NHL fans. Don't rub salt in the wounds by trying to turn us against our satellite provider.
Slamminc11 said:Fact-I didn't watch OLN before hockey
Fact-I wouldn't have watched it even if Dish had carried it with Hockey
Fact-I've seen OLN's version of hockey and
Opinion-It absolutely sucks!
Fact-I am a hockey fan
Opinion-If you really do work for the NHL, you guys got ripped off by OLN
Fact-I am glad that Dish stood up to them and decided not to drop OLN to top60!
Fact-You can say all you want, but because of "legal agreements" you can't provide us your proof then...
Opinion-We can take what you say with a grain of salt!
Fact-I still get to see the Av's play all I want to thanks to Altitude Sports Channel
Fact-I could care less if OLN ever comes back on Dish
OLN Hockey said:I answered your questions ... are you blind? ... can't read? .. or just don't process answers that don't "LOOK" good to you? ...
You asked me if I think OLN appeals to most housholds and I told you I could care less ... You asked me how I could POSSIBLY know some things and I told you how ... Sorry you feel I am rubbing salt in your wounds ... I could care less who you use as a DBS provider ... if you want to watch the NHL on OLN and really are a FAN then you will find a way .....
Bluebull32 said:I ask you if OLN appeals to most households....That is a YES or NO question. "I could care less" isnt an answer, that's just telling me how you feel about the question. I'm assuming your answer is "no", so it belongs in AT180, end of story. (BTW, the expression is "Couldnt care less" meaning that you care SO little that there is no possible way you could care any less.....you see "could care less" implies that you actually DO care, but i knew what you meant...free lesson for you)
Then I ask you to back up your claims with a link or SOMETHING, and you give me the speach about how you cant tell me legally. You might as well have said "I could tell ya, but I'd have to kill ya". Do me, and everyone on this board a HUGE favor, and only present something as "fact" when you can back it up. This is the internet and, believe it or not, youre not the only one who claims to have some "facts", but cant back it up. I would totally respect your opinions...if you present them as such.