Which channels exactly have been dropped?
I just checked Fox and CW on my DishAnywhere App and they are working.
I just checked Fox and CW on my DishAnywhere App and they are working.
I posted a list of all Sinclair stations by market a couple of weeks back, search for Sinclair.Which channels exactly have been dropped?
I just checked Fox and CW on my DishAnywhere App and they are working.
OK, I'll say it... they don't really have one aside from just getting more eyeballs on their product. So, are you willing to answer my question?So where is the motivation for the local affiliate to negotiate in good faith? Tell us that oh wise one
Over 300 calls in northern Michigan asking when Directv can be out to install serviceDish just lots my aunt as a customer after 17 years she is tired of all the disputes and losing channels etc. and is switching over to DirecTV and they will be out Saturday to install her stuff!
This is another good reason to have an OTA module attached to your DVR. I have OTA timers set for our favorite ABC channel in the St Louis DMA. My wife would be highly upset if she missed Celebrity Wife Swap tonite!
You can still set a manual recording, or, watch it live....I suspect that you will miss it if the guide data is not there for the OTA station.
This is another good reason to have an OTA module attached to your DVR. I have OTA timers set for our favorite ABC channel in the St Louis DMA. My wife would be highly upset if she missed Celebrity Wife Swap tonite!
Simple, Consumerism. People mostly want their local channel, not an import. While negotiations take place, an import is a fine solution, but eventually they want their locals back. Dish wants to make consumers feel like they want to give them more money. Offering their local station will give them satisfaction without costing to much. Besides, I don't think any of the MvPDs would want to be put back in the situation they are in now, if the FCC changed the ruling.OK, I'll say it... they don't really have one aside from just getting more eyeballs on their product. So, are you willing to answer my question?
Of course, that doesn't answer my issue which is what motivation does an MVPD have to negotiate in good faith if they're allowed to import other markets?
Simple, Consumerism. People mostly want their local channel, not an import. While negotiations take place, an import is a fine solution, but eventually they want their locals back. Dish wants to make consumers feel like they want to give them more money. Offering their local station will give them satisfaction without costing to much. Besides, I don't think any of the MvPDs would want to be put back in the situation they are in now, if the FCC changed the ruling.
Yes, it is a simple fix, but my point is is that Dish no longer gives a rat's *ss about OTA guide data.It is a simple fix, and never a bad thing to let them know what you feel. It took a grand total of 2 minutes to do.
They could be off DirecTV or any other cable provider in the not too distant future.Dish just lots my aunt as a customer after 17 years she is tired of all the disputes and losing channels etc. and is switching over to DirecTV and they will be out Saturday to install her stuff!
I don't know a good way to have a good "balance of power" in these negotiations. What I wish the FCC would come out with is instead of saying you can/can't import, dictate how much MVPD's would pay to locals based on ratings. For example, let's say a local station averages 5 points over the week (or month). The FCC says "you get .10/ratings point/subscriber". So Dish et al pays that station .50/subscriber/month. Then there's NO negotiation and there's never a chance of a blackout. If a MVPD carries a subchannel, again you look at ratings. Maybe the subchannel averages .5. The MVPD then pays the local a nickel a month/subscriber in addition.Agree with that, but..... For one thing, it isn't so much they can import them, it's the process the local has to go through in that scenario to stop it. Instead of it being instantly remedied by the FCC in stopping the import, it would now take longer. In the end the Provider will lose, in the meantime the full power is tilted a little for awhile from the local. So if the local does not want to be off too long while subscribers still get to watch the programming, and they are losing ad revenue, they may negotiate in better faith. Meanwhile the import only lasts so long so the provider has to be negotiating in good faith too.
Second, the FCC especially if the change is passed, is signalling they are not going to allow the consumer to be without programming every time a contract comes up, and may change the rules altogether.
Not buying it.I don't agree. There are lots of people with Directv that take distance channels over locals. These folks never come back to locals