Correct.I have 5 TV's and I will only be able to get 1 Hopper 3 and the rest will have to be Joey's?
Correct.I have 5 TV's and I will only be able to get 1 Hopper 3 and the rest will have to be Joey's?
YesI have 5 TV's and I will only be able to get 1 Hopper 3 and the rest will have to be Joey's?
Only 2TB HDD... He likes to archive.....How on earth, Why?
Nope its going to cost what a regular Hopper Costs. You will not see them charge on the number of tuners.
You need to understand that the Hopper 3 is designed to KEEP CUSTOMERS with DISH not drive them away, thus the reason why they are going to be aggressive with getting people upgraded to one who wants one.
I have to disagree. DirecTV has often responded to Dish. It is one of the reasons they have been so successful.IMHO I really haven't see DIRECTV counter much of anything Dish does, they march to the beat of their own research/marketing department.
I would really hope it does, if for nothing more than as a backup connection. HDMI connectors fail, sometimes TVs and receivers are incompatible on HDMI handshakes (usually fixed with firmware updates on one device or the other), etc.but does it have component video outputs?
Bah Humbug your no fun Ebinizer ScroogeGive it a rest. HDMI is by definition and spec backwards compatible. Dish cannot make it incompatible with earlier versions. They handshake to determine which spec is common to all.
Besides, it's been posted that it works fine with today's HDTVs.
Anything on picture quality improvements on the H3 or when the carbon UI will be released for the existing hoppers?
People insist that the 722 has better PQ than the 622, the 722k has better PQ than the 722, and the Hopper has better than the 722k. To a large degree, it's nothing more than a placebo effect - they want there to be a difference, so they are certain they see one (even if they don't).
People spend $100 on fancy HDMI cables and are absolutely certain they can see an improved picture too.