- Nov 29, 2003
- 15,875
- 20,350
…..TM.Yeah, no reason not to expect a similar promotion next year, no press or history stating otherwise so he's just going with negative/FUD draw people down the rabbit hole.
…..TM.Yeah, no reason not to expect a similar promotion next year, no press or history stating otherwise so he's just going with negative/FUD draw people down the rabbit hole.
I'm gonna predict Right Now, that it WILL go UP Next Year ....Yeah, no reason not to expect a similar promotion next year, no press or history stating otherwise so he's just going with negative/FUD draw people down the rabbit hole.
The price is really a function of two factors.I'm gonna predict Right Now, that it WILL go UP Next Year ....
I'll take a guess and say $20 - $40 .
This just gets more and more obsessive. It'll never go streaming. It'll never be standalone. Now it is Google won't make money off it and It'll be more expensive next year.
What is next? ST won't impact the net profit per share price above $0.05? Impact on the US GDP will be unnoticeable?
How do you make money when you pay 2.5 billion and charge at most $500?.. whyvof course..you make those who need to watch multiple games ( who could do that with ease on directv) buy 2 accounts..that would be $1000 for what would cost $350 ( premium plan) with directv...sounds like a homerun for youtube tv ..ching ching let those cash registers ring..the pure genius of googles plan..This just gets more and more obsessive. It'll never go streaming. It'll never be standalone. Now it is Google won't make money off it and It'll be more expensive next year.
What is next? ST won't impact the net profit per share price above $0.05? Impact on the US GDP will be unnoticeable?
They all read like hypocrites when they write that, did they ever complain when DirecTV was losing money on it, or were they ok with it since it was on their TV Provider of choice.This just gets more and more obsessive. Now it is Google won't make money off it and It'll be more expensive next year.
Alphabet’s cash on hand is $118 billion dollars, even if it losses half what the fee is, it will not even be noticed.What is next? ST won't impact the net profit per share price above $0.05? Impact on the US GDP will be unnoticeable?
DirecTV was losing over $600-700 million a year on ST since the last contract was signed in 2017, did you ever complain about that?How do you make money when you pay 2.5 billion and charge at most $500?..
Thats why they got rid of it...it makes zero financial sense to out bid them for it by a billion dollarsDirecTV was losing over $600-700 million a year on ST since the last contract was signed in 2017, did you ever complain about that?
Or, then in your opinion, it was ok for a company that has lost over 10 million subscribers since 2017 to be losing that much money?
No one knows yet how many subs they will sell, but you can keep putting up fake news that it is $500 if it makes you feel better.
I paid $250 for it, not $500.
and then they would loose there asses by giving it away to try and retain subsThats why they got rid of it...it makes zero financial sense to out bid them for it by a billion dollars
They made their money from subscriptionsand then they would loose there asses by giving it away to try and retain subs
I always thought it was a mistake to give it away in the last year, that just creates more people to seek it out, for example, how many now cancel DirecTV to get ST with YTTV, at a price that is less then DirecTV by itself.and then they would loose there asses by giving it away to try and retain subs
Nobody has to cancel directv..sunday ticket is available alacart..lots of sports on directv that youtube tv has no interest in carrying...google getting sunday ticket probably won't drive subscriptions to youtube tv..google needs something like the AFC or NFC contract to do that..much like fox did itI always thought it was a mistake to give it away in the last year, that just creates more people to seek it out, for example, how many now cancel DirecTV to get ST with YTTV, at a price that is less then DirecTV by itself.
From what I have read and learned from my new job, giving it away did not slow down the churn in the 4th quarter last year, which was why they did it.
Wow, could your posts get more idiotic , why would they need the contracts for those when they already carry the channels that has that content.google needs something like the AFC or NFC contract to do that..much like fox did it
I guess you don't understand sports fans wanting to watch sportsWow, could your posts get more idiotic , why would they need the contracts for those when they already carry the channels that has that content.
As far as other sports go, I assume you mean the RSNs, I have posted links after links showing those channels do not get good ratings, one of the last links I posted showed the NY Yankees was averaging a tad over 200,000 watching the game on Yes, in a metro area of 20 million, that is all who were watching.
Remember, the RSNs are in Bankruptcy (Ballys) or some are shutting dows (AT&T), rhe biggest provider that does carry them , DirecTV, who has the most sports, has lost 12 million subs in 7 years, while the services that do not carry them (YTTV and Hulu Live) are picking up subscribers.
*crying on knees beggings*Okay, time for more warnings. STOP TALKING ABOUT OTHER POSTERS! NEXT ONE GETS A VACATION!
no one knows yetI am a disabled confused how the pricing goes I am going to get Youtube Tv here are my questions
1 The plan you get is it the same plan you will have in the 2024 season with out the $100 2023 Discount
no one knows yet2 Will Youtube Tv have automatic Renewal in 2024 ?
You can just cancel and start back up next year.3 Can you pause the 72.99 a month fee after season ends and the start it back up a month before season stars in 2024