Yeah I didn't think the signal was going to be so difficult.... I think this is becoming a personal challenge now!
Towers (self supporting) are expensive and I would guess very difficult to erect... big tall masts require guy wires which I think get in the way of things... unless they are up on the house. The wife already fussed about having it on the roof... but maybe I need to convince her of the roof mount since it adds a bunch of elevation free of charge.
I had measured the peak of my roof and I think it was pretty much 15'. A 10 or 15' mast on a tripod mount with guy wires on the roof sounds a lot better than a full tower or tall telescoping mast on the ground. Of course part of her concern was the new roof being about 3 years old now, and her thinking leakage. But I would think leaking can be overcome with good tar pads or whatever they're called, along with some good sealing on the topside... Do you see that as correct long term?
So mounting on the house fixes several things. The aforementioned height advantage and a shorter coax run to the TV or DVR. How many sets of guy wires would a 10-15 ft mast require?
What seems difficult to me is trying to compare different antennas and brands since they don't all seem to provide the same info. They may show the gain and not the front/back ratio... some show beam width and others don't...
Like the Winegard HD8200U shows: 69 elements, beam width of 28-66 based on channel ranges, 14-20 front/back ratio (channel based), with 5-14.2 dB gain.
Or the Channel Master CM-5020: 28 elements, no beam width, 17 f/b ratio, with 10-16dB gain.
Or the CM-3020: 50 elements, beam width of 30 deg., 16 f/b ratio, with 8.6-9.5 gain.
Or the CM-5018: 17 elements, no beam width, 15 f/b ratio, with 9-13 dB gain.
So in my case what's the number one thing you would want that is better than another antenna?
Front/back ratio?
Total dB gain?
More elements?
Other?
Or is it more pick your poison and live and learn?
Thanks for reading and any more advice.