cone antenna

Status
Please reply by conversation.
Tested a Pulsat LX2000 a few years ago. The unit was retailed in Europe. It did not produce adequate gain for North American KU FSS reception. All I remember much about the specific testing results was that it struggled to receive all but the super strong transponders.

Here is the thread from last year: http://www.satelliteguys.us/xen/thr...g-cone-shaped-antennas-is-it-for-real.307903/

I posted some links:
Remlap has a cone type antenna converted to an universal LNBF in this thread:
http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/277581-Some-of-my-dishes-and-a-satellite-antenna

Several years ago we tested the Pulsat LX2000 and found that it only received the strongest transponders on the linear polarity FSS KU satellites. It was not 2 degree complaint with significant adjacent satellite interference. While it might work for the strong signals on the European satellites, it just didn't have the gain necessary for our lower power signals in North America.

Some reading on the Pulsat and other "out of the box" antennas and reflectors:
http://www.satelliteguys.us/threads/174714-No-Way-That-Could-Work!-The-FTA-Mad-Scientist-Thread
 
Manly I wanted 97 w and or 121w both pretty strong signals. Anyone know how to do the math?
 
I wonder what channel this guy is watching on his cone?

dog-in-e-collar.jpg
 
Status
Please reply by conversation.

BYU global back online @89w KU

Gbox V3000 positioner- display problem

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 1)

Latest posts