Ive heard this before and I do not doubt it. But how many HD channels does E* have?smodak said:1. The HD PQ of Voom is definitely inferior to dish 811.
Voom does have some channels that look outstanding IMO. And as a former D* customer I can say that that handful of channels is more than the entire offering of most sat services. Of course if you offer only 5 or 6 channels you can jack up the bandwidth and have a superior picture and monitor them closely. I think Voom is searching for the magic number and the magic codec in WM9. As long as they offer more and keep improving I will stick around.
The question is relevant, how do you compare? How does one compare a partial basketball team of SHAQ, KOBE and say Peyton against another full team of players? I think the analogy is appropriate here. If E* and D* offer 37 HD channels then we should compare. And compare the same channels. I would bet you that if V* added HDnet, Cuban would demand a high bitrate from V* like he does other services and you would see no difference in that channel from D* to V*. I do believe it is not just bitrate, there are some deficiencies in the software affecting PQ that will improve in time as well. Implementation of WM9 is supposed to free up space. I think we will have outstanding PQ then better than anyone elses at that point in time when they get it working correctly. The question is, beyond that point when they start loading up the channels, where will the quality "point" be defined? I think this issue will dissappear for awhile but be revisited again next year.