Man, Voom must have been good if people are still talking about it 6 months after it's demise. As for me, I wouldn't have touched Voom with a ten foot pole, not because they didn't have the best HD service, which they obviously did, but because they didn't have a dvr. I very rarely watch anything live anymore (like as in 10% of the time) with my HD-Tivo. Having that ability is even more important than HD to me. Yes, Directv's HD "package" is so pathetic it's maddening, but what I use the HD-Tivo for the most is Tivoing HD-OTA programs. When my half off HD package deal runs out in a few months I'll probably just cancel it. I don't see anywhere close to $11 a month in content there.
The Voom fans here can kid themselves all they want but the lack of a dvr really hurt Voom. Voom was marketed to people who wanted and had the best in home electronics. Consumers like that are the perfect candidate for a dvr. I know, I am one. If you want proof, tell me how else Directv could have sold HD-Tivos for $1,000 when they first came out, especially considering their horrific HD-package. Of course I paid $200 for mine through a "special" deal. That was the limit of what I would spend to get an HD-Tivo considering the sparse HD programming. To say how much I like my dvr, if I had the choice between all HD channels or a few with a dvr, I'd take the second choice everytime.
So I'm with Directv now, with an HD-Tivo just hoping that once they get the new sats. up their HD programming gets WAY better. If not, I may switch to Dish, but only if they improve their dvr's.
PS, I'm not here to rub salt in old wounds. I know how it is to lose something you like a lot. I'm just trying to provide another perspective on the subject, from someone who saw Vooms greatness, but didn't get it because of one major flaw.