If I am required to sign a new, 2 year contract for Dish Network's HD content, and then less than 4 weeks after signing that contract, they completely change their entire HD content so that it barely resembles what I agreed to in April, why shouldn't that be grounds for a lawsuit.
Specifically because I will be penalized if I ask to get out of my 2 year contract by Dish, regardless of whatever new channels they now offer. It still doesn't match what was offered at the time I signed up for.
In addition, I was required to pay a fee of $150 to upgrade my Dish service to HD, even though new customers were given this same offer for free. Don't anybody give me no Willy Wonka quotes. If 50% of the new content is NOT HD, or mostly filled with commercials, then its not a satisfactory replacement for the Voom channels.
You were not required to sign a new 2 year contract to get Dish HD... You chose to sign a new 2 year contract to save a little money.