"No-name brands" is the most critical part of this article.... who the heck wants to go back to an "Apex" player?
Still, if it forces the big-boys to get competitive, its not a bad thing. Sadly, I doubt it will anytime soon.
BD is missing the boat by not making players inexpensive..
I wouldn't want an Apex player but if drives down the prices, im for it.
Unfortunately I think the PS3 is going to be the best option for a blu-ray player for some time to come.
With Sony dictating the licensing fee and the added expense of making 2.0 players I don’t see cheap players anytime soon. At least no where near what J6P would consider cheap no matter who makes it.When COBY and APEX start releasing BluRay players the game is over for the big manufacturers. That's a good thing, because that will hasten the demise of DVD for new releases and bring down prices.
By the time a $200 BD player street most people will be accustomed to getting their HD content from alternatives.People are more acceptable to pay $200 FOR A BLU RAY Player. I know I would.
"No-name brands" is the most critical part of this article.... who the heck wants to go back to an "Apex" player?
Still, if it forces the big-boys to get competitive, its not a bad thing. Sadly, I doubt it will anytime soon.
BD is missing the boat by not making players inexpensive..
How many? How do you know?There are enough people who care to support the higher margins.
Is blu ray hd better than satellite hd?
How many? How do you know?
What is the point in creating a video-SACD format?
Diogen.