If that happens, D* or Comcast will get a huge influx of new subs long before it gets too bad...
Sorry, but here SBC became AT&T and asbsolutely nothing changed.And AT&T has already started milking me. With SBC, my DSL was cheap. Now, I get the same exact service for more money. I see them doing the same thing with Dish Network.
Yea, many years ago they used to bill me to busy signals. Back in the bulletin board days, I had QModem set to redial a BBS until it got through, and it took a while until it wasn't busy any more, and when the bill arrived from AT&T they were billing me for 1 minute each for every one of the busy signals, and refused to fix the bill. I dropped AT&T and went to Sprint instead at that time.
Sorry, but here SBC became AT&T and asbsolutely nothing changed.
It still continues to be the most reliable Internet service I have ever had (and I have had Internet service for over 20 years), and the price has not changed one penny since AT&T takeover.
I
There has been talk that Charlie has split Echostar off from Dish Network. This way he can sell the DishNetwork service to at&t and retain the hardware producing echostar. Then when he starts a 2nd service, he can continue to use the same hardware, unloads all of those mpeg2 legacy customers and can start fresh. hmmm..
If AT&T buys Dish then they may act more like D* and add a lot more channels and not feel as compelled to hold down the price like Charlie does. Or they may drag their feet and not change very much like some other companies.
I just fear that it won't nearly be a fun to track their movements online as we have been doing up until now. That is almost one of the reason I like Dish so much, is that its fun to watch them here in the online community.
Still, if things don't look good after an at&t aquisition, then I'd just move to D*. If Charlie starts a 2nd service, then I would likely jump to that immediately.
There has been talk that Charlie has split Echostar off from Dish Network. This way he can sell the DishNetwork service to at&t and retain the hardware producing echostar. Then when he starts a 2nd service, he can continue to use the same hardware, unloads all of those mpeg2 legacy customers and can start fresh. hmmm..
If AT&T buys Dish then they may act more like D* and add a lot more channels and not feel as compelled to hold down the price like Charlie does. Or they may drag their feet and not change very much like some other companies.
I just fear that it won't nearly be a fun to track their movements online as we have been doing up until now. That is almost one of the reason I like Dish so much, is that its fun to watch them here in the online community.
Still, if things don't look good after an at&t aquisition, then I'd just move to D*. If Charlie starts a 2nd service, then I would likely jump to that immediately.
There has been talk that Charlie has split Echostar off from Dish Network. This way he can sell the DishNetwork service to at&t and retain the hardware producing echostar. Then when he starts a 2nd service, he can continue to use the same hardware, unloads all of those mpeg2 legacy customers and can start fresh. hmmm..
So which of the two is it, assuming the company is split?
AT&T buying Dish Network, or AT&T buying Echostar? Are they after the residential customer base, or the equipment and patents side of things?