Digital is ok but I am a dedicated 35mil film fan not just for the hands on aspect of devoloping the film but also for the trial and error that comes from working with the images and putting them on paper or the anticipation you get when your using low light film and hideous shutter speed and aperature settings to create something incredible. I have a digital camera from sony thats a 5mp and I use it for pics of the kidlette ( man I miss her ) but digital still can not hold a candle to film photography though I dont know about the 14mp camera's that are out ( $8grand ).
I'm with MrPerdue, new tech is good in its own regards but there is honestly nothing better than static on an old LP or the sound quality of a reel to reel like the german made one my father brought back after vietnam. Digital photo equipment takes the finess out of the art form thanks to photo editors like adobe photoshop, any joe schmoe can spend 3 mins and make a dull picture look great but a film photographer has to make it happen as much as possible out in the field and the rest is back in the lab.