Another Spectrum Auction?

If n5, n66 and n2 are faster, provide lower latency and provide better speed over distance then their LTE counterparts, who cares?

The Ultra Wideband moniker is used for mid-band n48 CBRS and n77 c-band and n261 and n260 mmWave.
 
So what do they want? The rest of C-band and more OTA?
There was brief testimony about how OTA television is an outdated use of spectrum, but the main focus of the hearing ended up being how winning the "battle against China" for setting global 6G standards is dependent on quickly and safely auctioning off spectrum currently allocated to the Department of Defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: comfortably_numb
If n5, n66 and n2 are faster, provide lower latency and provide better speed over distance then their LTE counterparts, who cares?

The Ultra Wideband moniker is used for mid-band n48 CBRS and n77 c-band and n261 and n260 mmWave.
Its not what the consumer wants..its what the government and telcos want...5g is supposed to carry alot more than just "phone data traffic".. its supposed to be a fast reliable wireless internet backbone that will cover the entire nation...will it ever become that? Nooooooo..Fiber is the best solution...wireless is just the cheapest and fastest to be deployed
 
I get auctioning off Federally controlled spectrum. Selling C band would suck for us (and TV/radio stations), but selling more OTA spectrum would be painful for a lot more folks. Once you get a good thing going they've gotta screw it up. I don't see them selling off VHF, there's no spectrum there to take that's useful for cellular. TV/radio and 2 way radio is about all it can be used for. Worst case scenario we'll only have VHF stations (or a few UHF stations left) and Ku band FTA.

It kills me that the trend in the radio-wireless world is less about "Seeing how far distance-wise we can communicate efficiently" to "How can we communicate wirelessly as much as possible over ~25 feet". Wireless spectrum is scare, wired spectrum not as much.
 
Top