There was brief testimony about how OTA television is an outdated use of spectrum, but the main focus of the hearing ended up being how winning the "battle against China" for setting global 6G standards is dependent on quickly and safely auctioning off spectrum currently allocated to the Department of Defense.So what do they want? The rest of C-band and more OTA?
Its not what the consumer wants..its what the government and telcos want...5g is supposed to carry alot more than just "phone data traffic".. its supposed to be a fast reliable wireless internet backbone that will cover the entire nation...will it ever become that? Nooooooo..Fiber is the best solution...wireless is just the cheapest and fastest to be deployedIf n5, n66 and n2 are faster, provide lower latency and provide better speed over distance then their LTE counterparts, who cares?
The Ultra Wideband moniker is used for mid-band n48 CBRS and n77 c-band and n261 and n260 mmWave.
Evolve or Die.The race to 6G?
They haven't even got 5G working correctly yet.
Seems to me I remember we DID have that option at one point, and Scott took it away. I don't remember for sure just why though.so will just say I wish this forum had a thumbs down option.....