spacing between 123 & 125 LNBs
I could not find the focal length for the GeoSatPro 90cm.
I do have it for the Fortec Star 90cm dish.
= 510mm (about 20 inches)
edit: added 1.2m GeoSatPro dish as the request of RedSavina.
= 600mm (about 23.6 inches)
edit: added 1.0m Channel Master dish using measurements from Tron
= 705mm (about 27.75 inches)
Using the math in MJflash's thread, we calculate LNB separation for several cities around the USA.
This is for the 123° and 125° satellites:
Based on these calculations, neither the Fortec Star 90 nor GeoSatPro 90 (with a shorter focal length) would be good candidates for 2° spacing using any of these LNBs.
Obviously, if you live in the south west, you have a better chance than north west or anywhere to the east.
edit: the 120 cm dish has been added .
The results are in reasonable agreement with the comment posted by wescopc, above.
In fact, the 120 cm dish should probably be satisfactory for 2° spacing from Los Angeles, Long Beach, or San Diego. (or Mexico)
edit: the 1.0 meter Channel Master dish has been added.
The results speak for themselves.
Remember, you have the best chance for very close birds...
- when the satellites are near your true South,
- you are further south on the planet,
- and your focal length is longer.
I could not find the focal length for the GeoSatPro 90cm.
I do have it for the Fortec Star 90cm dish.
= 510mm (about 20 inches)
edit: added 1.2m GeoSatPro dish as the request of RedSavina.
= 600mm (about 23.6 inches)
edit: added 1.0m Channel Master dish using measurements from Tron
= 705mm (about 27.75 inches)
Using the math in MJflash's thread, we calculate LNB separation for several cities around the USA.
This is for the 123° and 125° satellites:
Code:
[FONT=Fixedsys]
..
focal length: 510 600 705
city zip distance between LNBs for 2[/FONT][FONT=Fixedsys]°[/FONT]
[FONT=Fixedsys] ----------- ----- --90cm FS----120cm GS ---1.0m CM--
Long Beach, CA 90807 32.11 mm 37.83 mm 44.42 mm
Austin, Tx 78705[/FONT][FONT=Fixedsys] 25.07[/FONT][FONT=Fixedsys] mm[/FONT][FONT=Fixedsys] 29.50 mm 34.63 mm[/FONT]
[FONT=Fixedsys]Miami, Fl 33196[/FONT][FONT=Fixedsys] 20.84 mm 24.53 mm 28.82 mm[/FONT]
[FONT=Fixedsys]Boston 02215[/FONT][FONT=Fixedsys] 19.60 mm 23.06 mm 27.04 mm[/FONT]
[FONT=Fixedsys]Minneapolis 55401[/FONT][FONT=Fixedsys] 21.51 mm 25.27 mm 29.72 mm[/FONT]
[FONT=Fixedsys]Seattle 98101[/FONT][FONT=Fixedsys] 24.02 mm 28.28 mm 33.23 mm[/FONT]
[FONT=Fixedsys]
Width of common LNBs (minimum center-to-center spacing)
Sky Mexico Universal 60 mm
105° FSS bandstacked 50 mm (maybe 45mm with crowding)
Eagle Aspen oval B/S 40 mm
[/FONT][FONT=Fixedsys]SatAV GeoSatPro Mini 40 mm
[/FONT][FONT=Fixedsys] A lot of manual calculation was required, with opportunity for error.
If you see a number that seems out of place, I'll double check it.
[/FONT]
Obviously, if you live in the south west, you have a better chance than north west or anywhere to the east.
edit: the 120 cm dish has been added .
The results are in reasonable agreement with the comment posted by wescopc, above.
In fact, the 120 cm dish should probably be satisfactory for 2° spacing from Los Angeles, Long Beach, or San Diego. (or Mexico)
edit: the 1.0 meter Channel Master dish has been added.
The results speak for themselves.
Remember, you have the best chance for very close birds...
- when the satellites are near your true South,
- you are further south on the planet,
- and your focal length is longer.
Last edited: