Thanks for the images!Thank you for the image. That looks like a good location on your property.
Here are the closeup Longley-Rice coverage maps:
Thanks for the images!Thank you for the image. That looks like a good location on your property.
Here are the closeup Longley-Rice coverage maps:
Since you are using a preamp, the coax you should keep short is the coax between the antenna and the input of the preamp. The loss in that coax reduces the antenna gain.So no answer as to whether going from 3 coax extenders down to 1 or 0 and quad shield cables instead of dual shield cables, if that would slightly increase my signal strength? I seriously only need the tiniest nudge in signal strength.
Thanks! Also I actually think I'm currently using two 1 shield rg6 cables, They are quite thin very flexible rg6 cables so I'm guessing it's not even dual shield. I have a 100ft quad shield cable coming tomorrow, hoping for good results!Every connection you make in the cable will loose about 0.5 dB. Four cables made into one then will net a loss of about 1.5 dB compared to a solid single cable. 3 dB is a 50% loss, but dB is a logarithmic scale not a geometric scale, so I estimate that to be maybe about a 25% loss in three connections.
A shorter cable would have slightly less loss also.
As for quad shield, it is to prevent local strong interference from penetrating into the wire. If you don't have other signal sources or sources of RF nearby, there is not really any need to go quad shield.