I'm not a huge fan of MS either, but there is an important difference between the two.....
Sony wants control of the content. They will do everything and everything to try to exert control over content and restrict fair use, to exploit consumers for as much as they can, by making them pay for content over and over since their media is not portable to other formats in most cases.
MS wants control of the delivery system and will do whatever they can to increase market share to crippling levels, even if they have to give stuff away for free to consumers to accomplish it. They encourage open standards (no Ipods/ITunes monopolies) and would prefer that content be as easily portable as possible, subject to limited rights constraints of course...
The latter seems to easily be the lesser of two evils in my book....
Sony wants control of the content. They will do everything and everything to try to exert control over content and restrict fair use, to exploit consumers for as much as they can, by making them pay for content over and over since their media is not portable to other formats in most cases.
MS wants control of the delivery system and will do whatever they can to increase market share to crippling levels, even if they have to give stuff away for free to consumers to accomplish it. They encourage open standards (no Ipods/ITunes monopolies) and would prefer that content be as easily portable as possible, subject to limited rights constraints of course...
The latter seems to easily be the lesser of two evils in my book....