Wouldn't it be great if someone offered a 4k only satellite service. Just like the old VOOM days
I think $5.00 per month.I had voom but cannot remember what I was paying for it.
We can lease transponder spaceSo... who is going to pony up $100M plus to launch the 4K satellite?
If they lease transponders on an existing satellite, (or either way) how much are you willing to pay per month for the limited 4K content (do I hear grousing about too many repeats?).
I'm guessing (WAG) it might start above $100 per month for 10 maybe channels.
I had voom but cannot remember what I was paying for it.
Haha ! Nope, not $5/month. You're probably referring to the Voom add-on pack that Dish offered. Voom was, at one time, a standalone satellite TV provider, just like Dish and Directv.I think $5.00 per month.
If I remember correctly, it was advertised at $39.95 a month for 40 HD channels. Getting 40 HD channels was a big deal at the time.Haha ! Nope, not $5/month. You're probably referring to the Voom add-on pack that Dish offered. Voom was, at one time, a standalone satellite TV provider, just like Dish and Directv.
And they were channels with not much content. I remember a warning was put out once that thieves were looking for homes that had the voom dish, because that meant the home owner had an expensive hdtvIf I remember correctly, it was advertised at $39.95 a month for 40 HD channels. Getting 40 HD channels was a big deal at the time.
I've said the same thing. But I think the Bigger the Tv set the more improvement you can see in the picture. I have a 50" 4k hdtv from Vizio and I really don't see any Wow difference in the picture when I watch Netflix in 4k than I did in 1080p either. But when they go to 8k , which I predict in three years, then we might once again see a Wow difference. But I won't be upgrading again for a while.I can live without 4K. To me the difference between 4K and 1080p is not nearly as significant as it was when HD came out. The picture quality between SD and HD was a huge improvement.
Yep, 4K suckered in a whole bunch of people. I have 65" and see little or no difference.I've said the same thing. But I think the Bigger the Tv set the more improvement you can see in the picture. I have a 50" 4k hdtv from Vizio and I really don't see any Wow difference in the picture when I watch Netflix in 4k than I did in 1080p either. But when they go to 8k , which I predict in three years, then we might once again see a Wow difference. But I won't be upgrading again for a while.
According to many viewing distance calculators, based on 20/20 vision, you have to sit 4 feet away from a 65 inch TV in order to get the full benefit of 4K. Not too many people sit close enough to the screen to get much benefit from 4K. Here is one example of a seating distance calculator: Projector Calculator - Screen Size Calculator - Distance CalculatorYep, 4K suckered in a whole bunch of people. I have 65" and see little or no difference.
Who sits that close to a tv of any kind? At least not in the living room or bedroom. Now in my computer room I sit close because I have a 19 " hdtv sitting on a book case near my desk .According to many viewing distance calculators, based on 20/20 vision, you have to sit 4 feet away from a 65 inch TV in order to get the full benefit of 4K. Not too many people sit close enough to the screen to get much benefit from 4K. Here is one example of a seating distance calculator: Projector Calculator - Screen Size Calculator - Distance Calculator
4K is just not worth the effort/expense. On Amazon and Netflix, can't tell the difference. There will be no OMG religious experience!
You can be certain that the TV manufacturers don't repeat that infoWho sits that close to a tv of any kind?