I honestly don't know what you mean. If I "mischaracterized" anything, I'm sorry but just so there's no confusion, will you please elaborate on what it is you think I said that was not true.
I'm not sure what you're zealous defense of Dish is attributed to but if it's just that you're a happy customer, that's fine. I'm happy that you're happy but please don't make a fool of yourself by insinuating I'd lie (that's what deliberate "mischaracterizing" is btw) - that's something I don't do.
First I want to restate - you have every right to be angry about the product not working.
And no I don't think you are deliberately mischaracterizing.
You stated:
This whole 622 fiasco is starting to bear a strong resemblance to what Dish did to owners of the 7xxx Dishplayers about 6 years ago.
I own a 7100 Dishplayer and followed the whole situation closely. The software for that DVR was created and maintained by a separate company. The guy who was responsible for the maintenance used to post on the Internet. The company never invested sufficient resources into maintenance, and it was difficult for E* and the company to track down problems that were half due to software and half due to Dish aspects like the EPG file format. All of this inspired E* to start their own DVR production, so that the developers and the sat engineers could work together. This was why E* offered to replace Dishplayers with 501 receivers - because they simply did not have sufficient leverage to get the other company to fix the problems.
As a brand new product by a new development team, the 501 had plenty of problems early on, but at a certain point, E* was able to fix all the recording and reliability problems, and the receiver (I still own one) has worked reliably for many years.
For all of you that are relatively new to Dish, they have a history of screwing up their receivers with software downloads, not admitting it and then taking forever to get them stable again. In fact, sometimes they don't recover until after newer models have replaced many of them.
These statements are simply taking isolated incidents with a minority of products and declaring that these are a "history".
And the "not admitting it" is entirely wrong. There have been more than one case of significant problems being discussed on either the Charlie Chat or the Tech Forum on Channel 101. In fact, if you look at the whole spectrum of technology companies, E* is near the top in terms of frank customer interaction, especially with regards to the Engineering Department.
Despite the claims of Marketing Departments, DVRs are a cutting edge technology that always has some problems, due to the pressures of keeping up with the competition. All the other DVR companies have Forums with extensive complaints about problems. Continually pushing the envelope with multiple tuners, HD, OTA, and dual output with PIP means that the software is increasingly complicated.
I always try to record important events using two different model receivers. Despite this, 99.9% of recordings have worked fine.