Too much is being melded into the steroids thread here, it goes all over the chart. So here is my question...do you think the incredible home run numbers in the 90's and 00's are the result of players taking steroids?
What's your opinion?
Please try to stay on this topic.
Thanks.
Sandra
You are asking TWO questions...EVEN YOU cannot stay on topic...your already starting off by confusing the issue.
Do steroids help ANYONE? Depending ON the steroids, it can help ANY human body to recoup from a serious injury much faster. NOW, as to your thread title, "
do steroids help baseball players?" YES....to recoup and make them stronger. DOES that help hitting home runs? YES and NO. YES because they are stronger. Most of the guys were or had the power to hit 20 or 30 homers....Do they become INSTANT home run hitters? NO. So if you went from 15 homers to 25 homers...are you suddenly a home run hitter? Why hasn't helped a pitcher throw 10 to 15 mph faster?
For every Sammy Sosa, McGuire, Bonds and A-Rod you give me....I give you Paul Le Duca, Randy Velarde, Fernando Vina and Brian Roberts!
ALL were in the Mitchell Report for taking steroids...ONLY Paul had a season over 18 hrs...and that was once!
Now your 2nd question, "
do you think the incredible home run numbers in the 90's and 00's are the result of players taking steroids?" YES and NO. OTHER than steroids, I firmly believe, harder, tightly wound balls...I know some will think this a BS argument, but WHY would there be conversations of a "deal ball era", did they take steroids right after that??!! I mean the jump in offense was OVER 40%....MUCH bigger jump than during the steroids era of the 90s and 00s...smaller ballparks and the OTHER big one, extremely waterdown pitching had ALOT to do with homer numbers being high.