Aren't you also presupposing that all the promised new hd channels will be actually broadcasting by September? Many of these channels have been rather vague about their actual startup dates. Can they be operational by the 4th quarter 2007? Or is the 1st quarter of 2008 more realistic? I hope that D* is not setting up its hd customers for a big letdown this fall. The broadcasters will have to get their hd signals available asap for this to work. My fingers are crossed for you guys.The truth is - as long as the sat goes up and deploys without issue, its a done deal.
To each their own. That's what makes all of this so great.
Aren't you also presupposing that all the promised new hd channels will be actually broadcasting by September? Many of these channels have been rather vague about their actual startup dates. Can they be operational by the 4th quarter 2007? Or is the 1st quarter of 2008 more realistic? I hope that D* is not setting up its hd customers for a big letdown this fall. The broadcasters will have to get their hd signals available asap for this to work. My fingers are crossed for you guys.
Note: The following is not intended as as indictment of DIRECTV but rather as a recognition of the misinformation that seems to have been fabricated by various DIRECTV apologists and fanboys:I would like to point out the errors in fact with the above statement.
1. DirecTV's plans were announced less than three years ago.
2. As for the timeliness of the execution of their plans, the have been running months late since the first step. Spaceway F1 was slated to be operational by the middle of 2005 (this means on or before June 30th). Spaceway F1 went live in October 2005. Spaceway F2 launched November 16, 2005 went live in April 19, 2006. DirecTV 10 is currently scheduled to launch five to six months late and DirecTV 11 appears to be up to a year late.
3. The end of 2007 was never mentioned in the original announcement nor any subsequent announcements. The completion of the MPEG4 constellation should have been complete with the successful "early 2007" launches and subsequent handovers of D10 and D11 which would be more along the lines of Q2 2007. More recent announcements have pinned the completion of the plan to June 30, 2008. In neither case is the grand plan expected to come to fruition at the end of 2007.Staying with Sea Launch was a decision that was made. They have/had an option to launch D11 with ILS that they choose/chose not to take. The plan isn't complete until it is fully executed and that won't be for "up to" one more year according to the latest information.I want to reiterate that this particular post isn't pointed at DIRECTV. This post is pointed at those who offer up their own personal interpretations of reality as historical fact. The problem with this alternate reality is that it gives subscribers, both existing and prospective, a distorted view of what is really happening (or not happening).
I realize that it is difficult to spot links given some of the color schemes. In any case, the link that we both included in our posts refers to a press release that was dated less than three years ago and that's decidedly at odds with the false claim of four years.#1 - The original announcement was made on 9/8/2004, DirecTV - Investor Relations - News Release
You're completely missing the point (and the reason that I highlighted my intentions in RED). My point was that the fanboys and apologists are pretending that everything has always been right on schedule according to the original announcement. DIRECTV isn't claiming that the completion of their expansion project will be done by year-end. They are no longer promising 100 HD channels by EOY 2007. They are no longer insisting that the Sea Launch failure will have no impact on their plans. They are no longer claiming to be the leader in HD programming. To DIRECTV's credit, the only questionable claim that they're currently offering is that their HD picture is better than everyone else's.#2 - AFAIK, DirecTV didn't do the actual manufacture and launch of either Spaceway satellite, they just contracted for them.
I realize that it is difficult to spot links given some of the color schemes. In any case, the link that we both included in our posts refers to a press release that was dated less than three years ago and that's decidedly at odds with the false claim of four years.You're completely missing the point (and the reason that I highlighted my intentions in RED). My point was that the fanboys and apologists are pretending that everything has always been right on schedule according to the original announcement. DIRECTV isn't claiming that the completion of their expansion project will be done by year-end. They are no longer promising 100 HD channels by EOY 2007. They are no longer insisting that the Sea Launch failure will have no impact on their plans. They are no longer claiming to be the leader in HD programming. To DIRECTV's credit, the only questionable claim that they're currently offering is that their HD picture is better than everyone else's.
It is in no one's best interest (save unscrupulous investors) to mislead others about what has and hasn't happened which includes the time line and other milestones.
What amazes me is that people still want to hold D* to an absolute schedule commitment based upon a 3 year old plan.
How many of you can say for absolute certainty what you will be doing in three years, and be able to follow a published schedule with no deviation or delays?
Hell, I can't even get out of bed in the morning on time.
My point was that the fanboys and apologists are pretending that everything has always been right on schedule according to the original announcement.
I was just trying to point out that the slippage was not due to things under D*'s control.
NOTE: My Black Ops pilots license is current
I think I can safely say that D* has total control of the situation, with the talk of a "scrub" coming, I'm sure this is exactly what D*has planned just to fuel the flame(ers).
D* has total control of the situation, they have worked in cahoots with Boeing, ILA and the weather channel to ensure the programmed delays have progressed according to "THE" plan, they've gotten more attention than any successful launch could ever give them.
The launch team has been very well compensated for towing the "company line".
BTW this information comes from a very connected CSR I spoke with on the back door phone line last night.
The lemmings will continue to fall without "questioning" why!
I'm not very good at this Harh anti D* stuff.
Here's hoping for a successful launch and rollout. :up
BTW. D* sub since 1997.
I dig the conspiracy theory. Getting the Weather Channel folks involved was, well, just plain genius!