Why I need a receiver with 4:2:2

[tdti1]

H.264/4:2:2 feeds have been starting here for a while and getting more popular.

 

[truckracer]

My Pansat 9200's are better than all of yours because mine has cooling fans I installed. My girlfriend's hair is prettier than all of yours' LOL

 

[pro96]

My Pansat 9200's are better than all of yours because mine has cooling fans I installed. My girlfriend's hair is prettier than all of yours' LOL

Haha nice.. oh and also nice about the fans

Posted Using The New SatelliteGuys Reader App!

 

[toucan-man]

Those Pansats run hot, does your girlfriend use the fans as a hair dryer for her prettier hair?

 

[madmadworld]

Why I need a receiver with 4:2:2
because i want something else...... gotta do 32apsk too now lol

 

[Lak7]

.....gotta do 32apsk too now lol

And a bigger Dish with some high quality LNBs.

 

[Anole]

And a bigger Dish with some high quality LNBs.

Yea, no more 80cm dishes . . . on C-band!

 

[northgeorgia]

...and a lovely new home to set up all this stuff

 

[Lak7]

Yea, no more 80cm dishes . . . on C-band!

I need "perfect" weather with a 10' BUD with PLL LNBs and a Commercial Demodulator to watch, and just barely. My TBS must show 15+ dB in Crazyscan before I even think of trying.

I have not seen a Ku 32apsk video feed, but would sure think 80cm with Cheapie LNB would not cut it - I may be wrong though.

 

[gpflepsen]

CBS March Madness... 4:2:2

 

[pro96]

And last ufc was itc and of course on 422. Yet another reason

Posted Using The New SatelliteGuys Reader App!

 

[madmadworld]

Yea, no more 80cm dishes . . . on C-band!

in a Arnold Schwarzenegger voice
dhese people witdh dhere little dishes trying to get our signals we must stop dhem lol

 

[madmadworld]

how much more would you pay for a new 422 box that would scan & Work like a s9, micro or pansat ? those are $100-180 so a mid price of say $150 + the 422 amount

if it could do 422- 264 it would be better than a AZ...... so it will.

little something to chat about

 

[phlatwound]

how much more would you pay for a new 422 box...

$4.22

 

[pro96]

how much more would you pay for a new 422 box that would scan & Work like a s9, micro or pansat ? those are $100-180 so a mid price of say $150 + the 422 amount

if it could do 422- 264 it would be better than a AZ...... so it will.

little something to chat about

And if it can blind scan as good as the x2 premium hd.. a beast

Posted Using The New SatelliteGuys Reader App!

 

[pwrsurge]

how much more would you pay for a new 422 box that would scan & Work like a s9, micro or pansat ? those are $100-180 so a mid price of say $150 + the 422 amount

if it could do 422- 264 it would be better than a AZ...... so it will.

little something to chat about

The AzBox miniMe American Edition will soon meet these requirements and bring additional features with our upcoming firmware updates

MSRP is $229 so I guess that makes the "422 amount" $79.

 

[eurosport]

The AzBox miniMe American Edition will soon meet these requirements and bring additional features with our upcoming firmware updates

MSRP is $229 so I guess that makes the "422 amount" $79.

Sounds like my next box! Keep us posted, pwrsurge.

Sent from my DROIDX using SatelliteGuys

 

[vc2]

PC Card DVB/S2 4:2:2 Receivers

I have several questions regarding the PC based receiver cards being discussed in this thread:

1. What satellite control software works best with the PC Card DVBS2 Receivers?

2. Is fast DVBS2 Blind scan supported?

3. Do the receiver cards and associated software support DiSEqC ?

4. Is the software Windows or Linux based?

5. Does it really take 5 minutes to tune a channel - - if so why?

I presently have an AZBox Premium HD Receiver which hasn't lived up to expectations. The software is buggy and will probably never get fixed. The satellite / transponder / channel lists are very difficult to manage. The product was abandoned by it's developers.

Are things any better with the PC based receivers?

 

[madmadworld]

The AzBox miniMe American Edition will soon meet these requirements and bring additional features with our upcoming firmware updates

hope you do.
but predict it will not happen.
just the make up of the box it can not be as easy to use as a Pansat or a S9,as these need no computer input to work.
don't get me wrong like my AZ's. but they are what they are....a box to watch tv with. but they are high maintenance.imo

 

[madmadworld]

I have several questions regarding the PC based receiver cards being discussed in this thread:

1. What satellite control software works best with the PC Card DVBS2 Receivers?

2. Is fast DVBS2 Blind scan supported? yes

3. Do the receiver cards and associated software support DiSEqC ? it is the software

4. Is the software Windows or Linux based? both

5. Does it really take 5 minutes to tune a channel - - if so why? no

I presently have an AZBox Premium HD Receiver which hasn't lived up to expectations. The software is buggy and will probably never get fixed. The satellite / transponder / channel lists are very difficult to manage. The product was abandoned by it's developers.

Are things any better with the PC based receivers?

no expert but get mine to work when needed. if you are good with computers it seems easy for those people.

had the AZBox Premium for years till i got a plus. what expectations where not addressed other than blind scan ? which it did not do when new. my rule of thumb if it does not have something when new it never will.