I have three systems..While I do think all of this is subjective.......
Very subjective.
I have three systems..While I do think all of this is subjective.......
I have three systems..While I do think all of this is subjective.
Here's my take. I have latest equipment from three providers.
Best HD picture:
Direc Hr44
Uverse Cysco (blasphemy-i know)
Dish Hopper sling
For some reason dish just does not look as sharp
as in the past?
Uverse has done upgrades in my area putting them on par with Direct.
I just had my main Hopper replaced-
Just my take. This all could change with software upgrades.
I have no loyalties here...just whatever looks better to my eyes..
MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 are both compression schemes and can be to several degrees depending on bandwidth allowed.
Generally OTA has less compression of its MPEG-2 signal. But MPEG-4 can get a factor of 2 more compression.
There are no uncompressed signals except off the back of the studio camera and maybe not then.
-Ken
+1. The Premiums and the live Pay-per-View movie channels seem to have the best HD PQ. However, I find Channels like History, NatGeo to be 2nd best or quite good, while the kids channels in HD don't look as good such as Hub. Also, let's remember that MVPD's also compress the AUDIO to make some room. The DD 5.1 from MVPD's is at LOWER resolution than one would get from their DVD or Blu-ray. OTA DD 5.1 is also at lower resolution.What are you watching when comparing them? I know that when I watch a program on HGTV or Food Network the quality doesn't look that great but when I watch a movie on one of the premium movie channels, especially a Pixar movie, it looks fantastic.
This thread should just die a slow death.
In this case, as too much fun.It's just a fun conversation to have.
You have to really nit pic the differences here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk