You're probably right.Then that means it must be the next HD channel for us Dish Folks.
You're probably right.
Are you guys serious? MHD is NO WAY worse or shows more repeats than Rave.
It's much better - the concerts are better and more modern - the video hours are a great mix of MTV and CMT and VH1 videos.. I'm very happy with MHD on FIOS now.
Man - you guys are DISH brainwashed!
Are you guys serious? MHD is NO WAY worse or shows more repeats than Rave.
It's much better - the concerts are better and more modern - the video hours are a great mix of MTV and CMT and VH1 videos.. I'm very happy with MHD on FIOS now.
Man - you guys are DISH brainwashed!
I have both services. I have to tell you there is no comparison. Rave is so far ahead of MHD. MHD has been playing the same rehashed programs as long as I have had them on my system. I posted this once before, if you think Rave has a high repetition factor then you SHOULDN'T see MHD. Their video quality spotty, they up-convert concerts and videos. If I'm paying for an HD channel, I expect the content to be true HD not unpcoverts. A lot of their stuff has been seen on other HD channels. They have the series Music in High Places which has been seen on other channels, I think it was Universal HD maybe when it was Bravo HD. Everything else has been seen elsewhere, they offer nothing new. Most of their stuff has been seen on MTV or other Viacom channels first. Since MTV Networks is producing less music I wonder where this HD channel will end up. Clearly it is not a priority to the company. Rave on the other hand has a much bigger inventory and they keep adding new things that are exclusive to Rave. Have you seen their Exclusive Premiere programs? They have Later with Jools Holland, Beautiful Noise, the Premiere of Soundstage, (yes, I know it's also on PBS, but they do get it first) a music talk show. At least they are trying to offer the viewer something new and unique. I feel like there is value in Rave. MHD just seems like an after thought. very disappointing. Does MTV think just becsause it has their name on it we will automatically thing it's good? Well it's not. They should stick to reality programs.
I have both services. I have to tell you there is no comparison. Rave is so far ahead of MHD. MHD has been playing the same rehashed programs as long as I have had them on my system. I posted this once before, if you think Rave has a high repetition factor then you SHOULDN'T see MHD. Their video quality spotty, they up-convert concerts and videos. If I'm paying for an HD channel, I expect the content to be true HD not unpcoverts. A lot of their stuff has been seen on other HD channels. They have the series Music in High Places which has been seen on other channels, I think it was Universal HD maybe when it was Bravo HD. Everything else has been seen elsewhere, they offer nothing new. Most of their stuff has been seen on MTV or other Viacom channels first. Since MTV Networks is producing less music I wonder where this HD channel will end up. Clearly it is not a priority to the company. Rave on the other hand has a much bigger inventory and they keep adding new things that are exclusive to Rave. Have you seen their Exclusive Premiere programs? They have Later with Jools Holland, Beautiful Noise, the Premiere of Soundstage, (yes, I know it's also on PBS, but they do get it first) a music talk show. At least they are trying to offer the viewer something new and unique. I feel like there is value in Rave. MHD just seems like an after thought. very disappointing. Does MTV think just becsause it has their name on it we will automatically thing it's good? Well it's not. They should stick to reality programs.