It's starting to sound like AT&T's UConnect beats everyone if you have more than one HDTV? Anyone agree?
It's starting to sound like AT&T's UConnect beats everyone if you have more than one HDTV? Anyone agree?
Most people aren't going to want to run HDMI cables through the house. I don't think that is practical. At least the current system uses existing wiring for most people.
If I upgrade to the 922, I will probably try the Sling Catcher route. Once more details come out, I may change my mind.
I was under the impression that the 922 would have the ability to Sling in two directions - that is, it would have an integrated SlingBOX and SlingCATCHER. Is this not the case?I would hope that you could use the 922 to sling HD Video and Stereo Audio to a Sling Catcher and watch HD on TV2 from the 922 DVR. I only want one DVR. I don't what to guess which TV I will watch a TV show later when I setting the DVR to record.
Ok whatever you say.
here have a look. EETimes.com - Monster and Gennum enable longer distance HDMI cables
Ten bucks. Again, you get what you pay for.
Now that is not to say there are not less expensive methods. Cat 5 can be used to carry component video and stereo audio over distances with good quality and less expensive than HDMI. I have seen that done. Perhaps that would be the way to go rather than being locked into HDMI.
Cheap HDMI cables are exactly that. Cheap.
NOTE**** I am not one of the electronics need a perfect picture people either.
I don't even know why someone would pay a fortune for HDMI when component gives a pretty good image. If you want WOW!, get HDMI...JMHO
I don't know the answer, but it is an interesting question. If it did, then in theory all of your programs on any DVR (assuming you have all 922's) would be accessible from any other DVR on your account; which would be great! My problem is that there isn't such a thing as an HD sling catcher (I don't think), and without that, it wouldn't be the complete solution.Anybody? Anybody? Beuller?
yeah a low grade cable.. Sure can.
A good mid level cable of 6ft is between $60 to $100 retail. Sure there are cheap cables out there. You get what you pay for.
I thought I steered this thread back on topic.Total nonsense. The cables from monoprice are great and dirt cheap. If you are paying more than that then you are getting ripped off period.
Been done already...starting with 722K.Or even a generic chasis that they can drop tuner modules into.
Been done already...starting with 722K.
Been done already...starting with 722K.
I thought I steered this thread back on topic.
Sorry I forgot , your the installer that thinks your worth a million dollars.Once again we're talking about a retro fit. Not new construction. And I don't give a damn what you think you know about HDMI. You're a homebuilder. Stick to that
Back off. You want to get snippy, do it on your own time. Conversation terminated.
What is it with you people? Have a differnce of opinion and you go off.
Ahh so there we have it. Evil companies trying to make a profit. Oh my heavens.For very good quality HDMI cables, HDMI Cable, Home Theater Accessories, HDMI Products, Cables, Adapters, Video/Audio Switch, Networking, USB, Firewire, Printer Toner, and more!
For high quality cables, Blue Jeans Cable -- Broadcast-Quality Cables at Reasonable Prices
Anything more expensive than these two places is marketing hype profiteering.
$200 for a 6 foot, 10 foot, 15 foot, 30 foot, 50 foot, 100 foot HDMI cable is a rip off from a company who learned how to make a better grade cable than the free stuff and then charge 1,000 percent profit by marketing.