would you care to name them?
There is no reason to call anybody out by name here. That type of discussion should be taken private.
would you care to name them?
There is no reason to call anybody out by name here. That type of discussion should be taken private.
Why ? The forum it's apparently taken place in is a "public" forum. Anyone can go there and find the topic and determine who's who.There is no reason to call anybody out by name here. That type of discussion should be taken private.
Who is that ? Just out of curiosity, what service does this person subscribe to, if any ? For a forum like the D* vs E* War forum, maybe a truly neutral person would be a better choice.the mod aparently forgot what his job is, and is part of the problem.
Why ? The forum it's apparently taken place in is a "public" forum. Anyone can go there and find the topic and determine who's who.
Only a few of the "staff" will lock/close threads. They have the whole "we're not like that other site" attitude. Scott will often do it though.... I ran across one thread where the person who started it commented how E* customers were "losers" and something about "take it in the a**" regarding the satellite launch failure. That thread just went *poof*.My personal preference would be to have the thread closed because it has turned into people name calling and threatening harassment charges on people.
Yeah the staff here is far and away the best staff on any of these forums when it comes to tolerance. While I didnt totally agree with closing the last thread, Scott did what he thought was best, and I respect that.Only a few of the "staff" will lock/close threads. They have the whole "we're not like that other site" attitude. Scott will often do it though.... I ran across one thread where the person who started it commented how E* customers were "losers" and something about "take it in the a**" regarding the satellite launch failure. That thread just went *poof*.
Because it serves not point to call people out. It just makes more trouble than it is worth. You are correct that people can read and determine who it is so if they want to they are more than welcome to.
My personal preference would be to have the thread closed because it has turned into people name calling and threatening harassment charges on people. I have learned my lesson and will no longer get involved in any of his discussions.
I have never been into the war zone, as I don't feel it's nessasary ....
That said, if you Close the thread, you'll just find those same people jumping into the others main thread and cause the same type of disturbance in the threads we all use now.
Jimbo
Infractions are not our thing... deal with itWell...for what its worth, nobody better call AVS the fanboy forum anymore. The Zealots and D*vangelists in that group have the troglodytes there beat hands down in terms of perverse brand loyalty and religous rapture, as well complete intolerance to a difference of opinion.
As for the conduct in that thread, I'm sorry, but to preserve the integrity infractions need to be firmly meeted out here, and one particular individual needs to be looked at a little closer stilll...as certain actions were more severe than most...
man some people will cry about anything. If you dont like what was said or being said USE THE IGNORE button. Ignore the user and the problem goes away. I am sure the mods are tired of hearing people cry because someone said something to them. We are all adults here for the most part, Act like it. click the ignore button and you will not have to see that person again. If you feel so "insulted" then dont return to that thread. Trust me there will be many more for you to check out.
man some people will cry about anything. If you dont like what was said or being said USE THE IGNORE button. Ignore the user and the problem goes away. I am sure the mods are tired of hearing people cry because someone said something to them. We are all adults here for the most part, Act like it. click the ignore button and you will not have to see that person again. If you feel so "insulted" then dont return to that thread. Trust me there will be many more for you to check out.
That's part of the problem that you can put a Mod in the Ignore list. We all talk so much about James Long on that other forum but we have a mod just like him here. He defends his provider like it's a religion. Everytime I read his posts, it's like reading an preaching Evangelist. He may not delete posts or threads like James Long but he acts just like him defending his provider.
That's part of the problem that you can put a Mod in the Ignore list. We all talk so much about James Long on that other forum but we have a mod just like him here. He defends his provider like it's a religion. Everytime I read his posts, it's like reading an preaching Evangelist. He may not delete posts or threads like James Long but he acts just like him defending his provider.
There was no "selective" enforcement in that thread , he pretty much let it take its course as the posters saw fitAnd lets not forget th selective enforcement of forum regulations...
Not everyone is bound by the same standards...