I have a little problem since BBCA was pushing it before any contracts were signed with any provider. Now they want to put pressure on the providers to put them on w/or w/o the contracts. In fact I still can't find ANY provider that carries them yet. I did some serious searching and just can't find it anywhere in the US.
Is BBCA/Discovery really in such a bad spot? Are there facts/new reports to back this up? I imagine (w/o any facts to back this up) that Discovery Communications relationship with E*, and the others is just fine, as none of the service providers would want to lose Discovery programming. Although BBCA is separate from Discovery, Discovery handles BBCA's distribution, and is probably handled similarly to Science, Animal Planet, etc. I bet BBCA is just fine, and the HD channel will be turned on in due course.And none of them will carry it until they fell they have the cheapest deal. BBCA HD is paying for the HD uplink and is now in a desperate situation. The providers like Dish, Direct TV, and cable know this. Now, from their perspective, they are really using this a leverage to get a cheap deal. They are in no rush, but BBCA HD is. BBCA (Discovery Networks) did this to themselves. Do you really think any of these companies are fighting to be the first to help BBCA HD out of its bad situation? Well, for the right, really low price, they would. Dish, Direct, et al. are really in the catbird seat. They have all the time in the world, not BBCA HD paying for an uplink and making no money. Can you really blame Charlie and Brian (Comcast) for NOT providing BBCA HD until they get a bargain?
T.I.D. my friend. (This Is Dish)
Did Dish ever make any official announcements about the addition of these two channels or are we all basing our scorn on the fact that Scott's rumors did not (yet) come to fruition?