I’m seeing signal strengths in the 70’s on the sats at 110 and 119. But only 40ish on the sat at 129. Are these reasonable numbers? If not, what should they be?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
No. I was just checking to see if I needed to re-peak the dish. I knew that 129 was weak when the old wounded bird was drifting/wobbling around. But I had assumed that the signal strength would be more like 110 & 119 after Dish replaced it.Sounds fairly normal. Are you having issues with signal going out?
You're good.
ok thanks. is it normal to have a difference of 30 on different transponders on the same satellite? I wouldn't care if espn hd (119x7) wasn't my lowest signal strength on all 3 satellites.I didn't see the 31. 31 is low. 61 is good though.
I must have missed somthing regarding Ciel 2's health at 129 leased to Dish for most of its HD services. Ciel 2 was launched in late 2008 and quickly began service in 2009. That is a relatively young satellite, and I have not heard any news of it having any major anomalies.No. I was just checking to see if I needed to re-peak the dish. I knew that 129 was weak when the old wounded bird was drifting/wobbling around. But I had assumed that the signal strength would be more like 110 & 119 after Dish replaced it.
Yes I was referring to Echostar V that wandered around due to a damaged gyro? or something like that.....Perhaps you are referring to the satellite Ciel 2 replaced: Echostar V? That sat was, indeed, very ill, and its reposition to 129 was a temporary solution to getting HD up in good numbers until Ceil 2 could be launched and put into service. ....
Just curious why are your signal strength so high but loose reception easily on the mainland. I live in hawaii and we have tons of rain where I live at, my signal strength are between 14-40 for all 3 sats. We have no signal loss issue, at least there is thunder and lightening.