I don't know...but Rainbow really had no other choice but to shuttle VOOM since they have elected to pursue the lawsuit first and foremost; They want to prove that Dish Network's termination of the affiliation agreement killed VOOM, which was the basis of their complaint. If VOOM wins the case, it could make the Tivo verdict look like chump change. Conversely, if Rainbow Media were to come out with new HD programming/channels, I don't know how this would be perceived and evaluated by a judge or jury since Rainbow had a long history as a successful cable programmer: AMC, IFC, WE, etc.Could just be status of depositions. Perhaps one side or the other is having difficulty with people appearing to be deposed.
If Voom really was "evaluating different strategies and plans for Voom's domestic business", they would have split up the channels ages ago. That makes me doubt they are up to anything other than putting a positive spin on a press release.
I doubt they could give DirecTV Voom for free for distribution. That would certainly not look good to a judge in the Dish-Voom lawsuit.
Anyone think Dish might use Voom's failure as an argument in court that Voom would have failed anyway, even with continued Dish distribution?
In any case, if Rainbow elects to market new products and services, they can do so since they will be operating outside of the VOOM space.